Academic Pediatrics
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 26-32, January 2009

Inner-City Caregivers’ Perspectives on Bed Sharing With Their Infants

  • Jennifer Chianese, MD, MS
  • ,
  • Dianna Ploof, EdD
  • ,
  • Charlene Trovato, PhD
  • ,
  • Judy C. Chang, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Judy C. Chang, MD, MPH, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Chianese and Dr Ploof); Department of Administrative and Policy Studies, University of Pittsburgh School of Education, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Trovato); and Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences and Internal Medicine, Magee-Women's Research Institute, and Center for Research in Health Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Chang)

Received 19 September 2007; accepted 18 November 2008.

Objective

–To understand parents’ motivations for bed sharing with their infants aged 1–6 months, their beliefs about safety concerns, and their attitudes about bed-sharing advice.

Methods

–We conducted 4 focus groups with primary caregivers of infants ages 1–6 months who regularly shared beds with their infants. We recruited participants from an inner-city primary care center in Pittsburgh, serving primarily African American families who received medical assistance. Discussions were audiotaped and transcribed. Two investigators coded the transcripts and identified themes in an iterative process to achieve agreement between coders.

Results

–A total of 28 caregivers aged 17–50 participated. The majority were African American (86%), female (93%), single (50%), and high school graduates (71%). Eleven percent of participants breast-fed their infants. We identified 5 themes, common to all groups, to explain parents’ motivations for bed sharing: 1) better caregiver and infant sleep, 2) convenience, 3) tradition, 4) child safety, and 5) parent and child emotional needs. Parents expressed divergent views about the safety of bed sharing: 1) ambivalence regarding balancing risks of overlaying and suffocation with benefits of bed sharing, or 2) assertion that bed sharing poses no risks for their child. Common to all groups was the finding that clinicians’ advice against bed sharing did not influence parents’ decision, but advice to increase safety when bed sharing would be appreciated.

Conclusions

–Parents’ motivation to bed share outweighed the concerns and the warnings of others. An understanding of parents’ perspectives on bed sharing should inform counseling to promote safe sleeping practices.

Key Words: bed sharing, cosleeping, focus groups, SIDS

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1876-2859(08)00266-0

doi:10.1016/j.acap.2008.11.005

Academic Pediatrics
Volume 9, Issue 1 , Pages 26-32, January 2009