Journal Home
Search for

Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 14-20 (January 2010)


View previous. 8 of 20 View next.

A Randomized Controlled Community-Based Trial to Improve Breastfeeding Rates Among Urban Low-Income Mothers

Linda C. Pugh, PhD, RNC, CNE, FAANCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Janet R. Serwint, MD, Kevin D. Frick, PhD, Joy P. Nanda, DSc, MS, MHS, MBA, Phyllis W. Sharps, PhD, RN, CNE, FAAN, Diane L. Spatz, PhD, RNC, FAAN, Renee A. Milligan, PhD, CRNP

Received 15 December 2008; accepted 19 July 2009. published online 26 October 2009.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess whether providing a breastfeeding support team results in higher breastfeeding rates at 6, 12, and 24 weeks postpartum among urban low-income mothers.

Methods

Design: A randomized controlled trial with mother-infant dyads recruited from 2 urban hospitals. Participants: Breastfeeding mothers of full-term infants who were eligible for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (n=328) were randomized to intervention (n=168) or usual-care group (n=160). Intervention: The 24-week intervention included hospital visits by a breastfeeding support team, home visits, telephone support, and 24-hour pager access. The usual-care group received standard care. Outcome Measure: Breastfeeding status was assessed by self-report at 6, 12, and 24 weeks postpartum.

Results

There were no differences in the sociodemographic characteristics between the groups: 87% were African American, 80% single, and 51% primiparous. Compared with the usual-care group, more women reported breastfeeding in the intervention at 6 weeks postpartum, 66.7% vs 56.9% (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.07–2.76). The difference in rates at 12 weeks postpartum, 49.4% vs 40.6%, and 24 weeks postpartum, 29.2% vs 28.1%, were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The intervention group was more likely to be breastfeeding at 6 weeks postpartum compared with the usual-care group, a time that coincided with the most intensive part of the intervention.

York College of Pennsylvania, York, Pa (Dr Pugh); General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (Dr Serwint); Department of Health Policy and Management (Dr Frick) and Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health (Dr Nanda), Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md; Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Md (Dr Sharps); University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Spatz); and George Mason University, Fairfax, Va (Dr Milligan)

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Linda C. Pugh, PhD, RNC, CNE, FAAN, 441 Country Club Rd, York, Pennsylvania 17403.

PII: S1876-2859(09)00206-X

doi:10.1016/j.acap.2009.07.005


View previous. 8 of 20 View next.