<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/?rss=yes"><title>Academic Pediatrics</title><description>Academic Pediatrics RSS feed: Current Issue. 
 Academic Pediatrics , the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose 
is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, 
research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, 
holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentaton 
of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. 
The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization 
of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid 
research in child health and education.</description><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>1876-2859</prism:issn><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>March 2010</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS187628591000029X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003180/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000161/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000136/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000045/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000112/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003672/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003039/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000033/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003660/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000021/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003167/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000240/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000264/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS187628591000029X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Overview</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS187628591000029X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Overview</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1876-2859(10)00029-X</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>e1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>e4</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003180/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Wisdom, the Will, and the Wallet: Leadership on Behalf of Kids and Families</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003180/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>It has been a genuine pleasure to serve as the president of the Academic Pediatric Association (APA). The APA plays a critical leadership role in setting the agendas that shape clinical care, education, research, and advocacy on behalf of kids and families. Today, I wanted to reflect on leadership lessons I have learned and relate them to the challenges we face to improve the health and well-being of children and families. I refer to these challenges as “the wisdom,” “the will,” and “the wallet.”</description><dc:title>The Wisdom, the Will, and the Wallet: Leadership on Behalf of Kids and Families</dc:title><dc:creator>Tina L. Cheng</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2009.12.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Academic Pediatric Association Presidential Address</prism:section><prism:startingPage>81</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>86</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000161/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Child Health Care Disparities: Findings from the Annual Report on Children's Health Care</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000161/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The annual report on child health appears in this issue of Academic Pediatrics, and its focus this year is on health care disparities. Child health and health care disparities can be defined as an inequitable difference in health or health care that is based on demographic characteristics such as race, ethnicity, generational status, socioeconomic position, or geography. For these differences to be labeled as disparities, they must be inequitable, systematic, and potentially avoidable. The current article, which reports on analyses culled from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), breaks down child health care quality indicators on the basis of race/ethnicity, income, and insurance status, and thus it provides an interesting look at the interactions among these distinct but interrelated categories.</description><dc:title>Child Health Care Disparities: Findings from the Annual Report on Children's Health Care</dc:title><dc:creator>Lee M. Pachter</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2010.01.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Commentaries</prism:section><prism:startingPage>87</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>88</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000136/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Celebrating Education and Building the Community of Pediatric Educators</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000136/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The inclusion of 5 educational articles in this issue of Academic Pediatrics allows us to highlight the work of pediatric educators. It also provides us with the opportunity to reiterate the principles that guide our review of educational articles and to announce our desire to serve as a venue for the dissemination of scholarly work from across the continuum of education.</description><dc:title>Celebrating Education and Building the Community of Pediatric Educators</dc:title><dc:creator>Maryellen E. Gusic</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2010.01.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Commentaries</prism:section><prism:startingPage>89</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>90</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000045/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Next Phase of Pediatric Residency Education: The Partnership of the Milestones Project</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000045/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>We are at a crossroads in medical education. In the wake of the Institute of Medicine duty hours report, the health care reform debate, and concerns of patient safety, policymakers and the public are demanding a response. The American Board of Pediatrics, the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the Association of Pediatric Program Directors (APPD), and other organizations are working together to position pediatrics to meet these demands and keep the public trust for excellence in the care of children.</description><dc:title>The Next Phase of Pediatric Residency Education: The Partnership of the Milestones Project</dc:title><dc:creator>Jerry L. Rushton, Patricia J. Hicks, Carol L. Carraccio</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2010.01.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>View from the APA</prism:section><prism:startingPage>91</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>92</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000112/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Sounds of a Code</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000112/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Yesterday I was jeopardized to take call in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Two words I will never forget. Jeopardy. PICU. Yuck. I've been there before, but this call was different, thus the need to put it down in writing as I sit at my computer on the floor of my living room.</description><dc:title>Sounds of a Code</dc:title><dc:creator>Stephanie K. Neumayer</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2010.01.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>In the Moment</prism:section><prism:startingPage>93</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>94</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003672/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Annual Report on Health Care for Children and Youth in the United States: Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Health Care Quality</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003672/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the joint effect of race/ethnicity and insurance status/expected payer or income on children's health care quality.Methods: The analyses are based on data from a nationally representative random sample of children in the United States in 2004 and 2005 from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and pediatric hospitalizations from a nationwide sample of hospitals in 2005 from the State Inpatient Databases disparities analysis file from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). We provide estimates of differences in race/ethnicity within income and insurance/expected payer categories on key pediatric quality indicators to provide a more nuanced understanding of disparities in care for children. Our indicators of quality cover several domains from the Institute of Medicine report, including effectiveness, patient centeredness, timeliness, and patient safety.Results: Across a broad set of 23 quality indicators, findings indicate that racial/ethnic disparities vary by income levels and types of insurance. Key highlights include the finding that racial/ethnic differences within income or insurance/payer groups are more pronounced for some racial/ethnic groups than others. Hispanic children followed by Asian children had worse quality than whites as measured by the majority of quality indicators. Exceptions included rates of admissions for diabetes, admissions for gastroenteritis, accidental puncture during procedures, and decubitus ulcers. Many indicators showed less than ideal quality for all subgroups of children, even whites with private insurance.Conclusions: The extensive findings in this report make clear that patterns of racial/ethnic disparity vary by income and insurance/expected payer subgroup. However, disparities in quality are not similar across all measures of quality, and strategies to address these disparities need to be designed with these nuances in mind.</description><dc:title>Annual Report on Health Care for Children and Youth in the United States: Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Children's Health Care Quality</dc:title><dc:creator>Terceira Berdahl, Pamela L. Owens, Denise Dougherty, Marie C. McCormick, Yuriy Pylypchuk, Lisa A. Simpson</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2009.12.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Annual Report on Children's Health Care</prism:section><prism:startingPage>95</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>118</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003039/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Continuity of Care in Fixed-Day Versus Variable-Day Resident Continuity Clinics</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003039/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective: Since the introduction of resident work-hour standards, pediatric residency programs have struggled to preserve robust continuity clinic experiences. Many programs have resorted to more flexible approaches to resident scheduling. We know little regarding the impact of such changes. We compared 2 continuity clinic scheduling models: a traditional fixed-day clinic and a variable-day clinic in which resident clinic days vary each week to accommodate resident schedules.Methods: The setting for our study was a large university resident continuity clinic. We analyzed 111 resident schedules and 1113 visits by children aged younger than 1 year during 2 periods: July 2007 to December 2007, when residents were scheduled by using a variable-day clinic model, and July 2008 to December 2008, when a fixed-day model was used. We compared the number of clinic sessions per resident and continuity of care. We used the usual provider of care definition of continuity: the proportion of visits in which a patient is seen by his or her primary resident. A multivariable logistic regression was used to model the relationship between patient continuity of care and clinic structure (fixed-day vs variable-day), resident level, patient age, and appointment type.Results: The number of clinics per resident during a 6-month period was higher using variable-day scheduling (19.6 vs 16.2; P &lt; .01), whereas continuity of care was lower (0.54 vs 0.61; P = .01) In the multivariate model, continuity of care was significantly higher under the fixed-day model (odds ratio 1.40; P &lt; .01).Conclusions: Scheduling residents for continuity clinic on variable days results in lower patient continuity of care despite increased resident time in clinic.</description><dc:title>Continuity of Care in Fixed-Day Versus Variable-Day Resident Continuity Clinics</dc:title><dc:creator>Carlos F. Lerner, Peter J. Chung</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2009.11.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Pediatric Education</prism:section><prism:startingPage>119</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>123</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000033/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Factors Associated with Successful Self-Directed Learning Using Individualized Learning Plans During Pediatric Residency</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000033/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether resident or program characteristics are associated with effective self-directed learning of residents.Methods: A cross-sectional survey of pediatric and medicine/pediatric residents and program directors from a nationally representative sample of residency programs was conducted. Self-directed learning efficacy was measured by resident-reported progress on learning goals from their most recent individualized learning plan (ILP). Multilevel linear regression models were used to analyze the relationship between learner and program characteristics and self-directed learning efficacy of residents.Results: All program directors of participating programs (N = 46) completed the survey; the response rate from residents was 57% (992/1739). At the time of the survey, 78% of residents had previously written an ILP. Most residents achieved moderate self-directed learning efficacy. The most important factors associated with greater self-directed learning efficacy included using a system to track one's own progress in achieving learning goals, higher score on a propensity toward lifelong learning scale, and reporting greater confidence in self-directed learning abilities. Program characteristics, including program-level support for ILPs, had little or mixed association with resident self-directed learning efficacy.Conclusions: The most important factors associated with effective self-directed learning were resident characteristics. Our findings imply that residency programs should invest their limited resources in curricula that help residents develop measurable goals and systems for tracking progress toward goal attainment. Since propensity toward lifelong learning was an important factor, medical schools and residency training programs should enhance their efforts to develop this characteristic in learners.</description><dc:title>Factors Associated with Successful Self-Directed Learning Using Individualized Learning Plans During Pediatric Residency</dc:title><dc:creator>Su-Ting T. Li, Daniel J. Tancredi, John Patrick T. Co, Daniel C. West</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2009.12.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Pediatric Education</prism:section><prism:startingPage>124</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>130</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003660/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effectiveness of an Online Pediatric Primary Care Curriculum</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003660/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a supplementary online pediatric primary care (PPC) curriculum in reaching pediatric residents and increasing knowledge in selected primary care topics.Methods: We conducted a nonrandomized, controlled, pre-test/post-test study comparing an online PPC curriculum supplement with the traditional formal, conference-based curriculum alone, both with identical content. We compared 2 groups of first-year categorical pediatric residents from 2 successive years: one group (from 2006–2007) was offered the online curriculum supplement (study group) and one (2005–2006) was not (control group). Comparisons were made using the following: 1) pre-testing and post-testing of knowledge; and 2) monitoring of attendance at the formal conferences and accessing the online curriculum.Results: The control group of 33 residents and the study group of 34 residents were similar with respect to gender, age, and first-year in-training exam scores. In the first quarter of the year, 93% (mean) of the study group accessed the online curriculum; 43% accessed it in the last quarter of the year. For the same time periods, 33% and 30% of all of the residents (intervention and control groups combined) attended the noon conferences. The pre-test and post-test scores of the study group showed a significant increase (P &lt; .001), and the post-test score comparison of study versus control group was also significant (P = .035). There were no significant differences in the in-training exam scores between the 2 groups for exams given at the beginning of their second year.Conclusion: An online PPC curriculum is an effective supplement to traditional resident education and reaches a significantly larger number of residents compared with the traditional conference-based format.</description><dc:title>Effectiveness of an Online Pediatric Primary Care Curriculum</dc:title><dc:creator>Raymond C. Baker, Melissa Klein, Zeina Samaan, Kadriye Lewis</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2009.12.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Pediatric Education</prism:section><prism:startingPage>131</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>137</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000021/abstract?rss=yes"><title>PHACES (Photographs of Academic Clinicians and Their Educational Status): A Tool to Improve Delivery of Family-Centered Care</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000021/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if an information sheet containing photographs and explanations of the training level of medical providers could enhance a parent's ability to identify their child's providers and whether this would impact parental attitudes toward trainee involvement and patient satisfaction.Methods: This was a prospective, mixed methods study of parent-child dyads admitted to an academic general pediatric inpatient service. The intervention group received a photo information sheet (Photographs of Academic Clinicians and Their Educational Status [PHACES] tool) consisting of passport-sized photos of the medical team along with information regarding their training. Parents were asked to name their child's providers, were surveyed about their attitudes toward trainees, participated in a brief, semistructured interview and completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire (ABIM-PSQ).Results: Comparing intervention with control parents, 40 of 49 (82%) versus 19 of 51 (37%) were able to name at least one provider (adjusted odds ratio 8.0; P &lt; .01). Parents who received the intervention were more likely to correctly match the face with the name of the medical student (67% vs 14%; P &lt; .01) and attending (80% vs 24%; P &lt; .01). Parents who received the intervention were more likely to report acceptance of the involvement of medical students and house staff as well as an improved understanding of their roles. Parents who received the intervention scored higher on the ABIM-PSQ (mean 48.3 vs 45.4; P = .008).Conclusions: An information sheet containing the photographs of health care providers along with an explanation of their training improves recognition of the health care team members, improves acceptance of trainee involvement, and improves satisfaction with care delivered by physicians in training.</description><dc:title>PHACES (Photographs of Academic Clinicians and Their Educational Status): A Tool to Improve Delivery of Family-Centered Care</dc:title><dc:creator>Robert A. Dudas, Hanna Lemerman, Michael Barone, Janet R. Serwint</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2009.12.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Pediatric Education</prism:section><prism:startingPage>138</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>145</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003167/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Peer-Facilitated Virtual Action Learning: Reflecting on Critical Incidents During a Pediatric Clerkship</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285909003167/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Objectives: Action learning (AL) facilitates reflection, critical thinking, and learning while solving real-world problems. Virtual AL is an asynchronous collaborative process that encourages students to analyze their critical incidents and learn from these experiences. The researchers sought to: 1) determine whether medical students engaged in peer-facilitated virtual action learning (VAL) demonstrated reflection and critical thinking around complex issues during their pediatric clerkship; and 2) identify challenges students face during their clerkships.Methods: Seventy clerkship students were introduced to reflection and participated in VAL by using an electronic discussion board. Each posted 1 critical incident and group members responded with thought-provoking questions and comments to facilitate reflection and analysis. Weekly, students who posted incidents revisited their incidents, pondered the questions posed, and wrote essays summarizing their reflections and insights gained. Data were analyzed using qualitative methods.Results: Seventy incidents, 210 responses, and 70 revised incidents/essays were analyzed. Outcomes included broadened perspectives (44/70), questioned assumptions (12/70), and reconfirmed thinking (14/70). Content themes included communication, role identification, medical treatment concerns, and limited voice and power.Conclusions: Most of the students engaged in VAL demonstrated reflection on complex clinical issues. Themes portrayed struggles encountered and exposed issues in the hidden curriculum, suggesting a lack of voice and power that may lead to missed learning opportunities. Discussion threads offered the clerkship director insights into the overall student experience to improve future clerkship experiences.</description><dc:title>Peer-Facilitated Virtual Action Learning: Reflecting on Critical Incidents During a Pediatric Clerkship</dc:title><dc:creator>Margaret M. Plack, Maryanne Driscoll, Maria Marquez, Larrie Greenberg</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.acap.2009.11.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Pediatric Education</prism:section><prism:startingPage>146</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>152</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000240/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Editorial Board</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000240/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Editorial Board</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1876-2859(10)00024-0</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000264/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Table of Contents</title><link>http://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/PIIS1876285910000264/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Table of Contents</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S1876-2859(10)00026-4</dc:identifier><dc:source>Academic Pediatrics 10, 2 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Academic Pediatrics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>10</prism:volume><prism:number>2</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1876-2859(10)X0002-X</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Frontmatter</prism:section><prism:startingPage>A1</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>A1</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>