Advertisement

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs), Epidemiology, and Epistemology: Reflections on EMRs and Future Pediatric Clinical Research

  • Richard C. Wasserman
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to Richard C. Wasserman, MD, MPH, University of Vermont, N310 Courtyard at Given, 89 Beaumont Ave, Burlington, Vermont 05405.
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vt, Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS), American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Ill, and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Electronic medical records (EMRs) are increasingly common in pediatric patient care. EMR data represent a relatively novel and rich resource for clinical research. The fact, however, that pediatric EMR data are collected for the purposes of clinical documentation and billing rather than research creates obstacles to their use in scientific investigation. Particular issues include accuracy, completeness, comparability between settings, ease of extraction, and context of recording. Although these problems can be addressed through standard strategies for dealing with partially accurate and incomplete data, a longer-term solution will involve work with pediatric clinicians to improve data quality. As research becomes one of the explicit purposes for which pediatricians collect EMR data, the pediatric clinician will play a central role in future pediatric clinical research.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • US Institute of Medicine. Committee on Improving the Patient Record
        The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care.
        Rev ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC1997
        • Reiser S.J.
        The clinical record in medicine, part 1: learning from cases.
        Ann Intern Med. 1991; 114: 902-907
        • Wang S.J.
        • Middleton B.
        • Prosser L.A.
        • et al.
        A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care.
        Am J Med. 2003; 114: 397-403
      1. Garets D, Davis M. Electronic medical records vs electronic health records: yes, there is a difference. 2006. Available at: http://www.himssanalytics.org/docs/wp_emr_ehr.pdf. Accessed June 21, 2010.

        • McDonald C.J.
        • Overhage J.M.
        • Tierney W.M.
        • et al.
        The Regenstrief medical record system: a quarter century experience.
        Int J Med Inform. 1999; 54: 225-253
        • Burt C.
        • Sisk J.
        Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records?.
        Health Aff. 2005; 24: 1334-1343
        • Kemper A.
        • Uren R.
        • Clark S.
        Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 118: e20-e24
        • DesRoches C.
        • Campbell E.
        • Rao S.
        • et al.
        Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 50-60
        • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
        Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program.
        Fed Reg. 2010; : 1844
        • Blumenthal D.
        Stimulating the adoption of health information technology.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1477-1479
        • Weiner M.
        • Embi P.
        Toward reuse of clinical data for research and quality improvement: the end of the beginning?.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 359-360
      2. Olsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis JM. Learning healthcare system: workshop summary. IOM Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine. Paper presented at: IOM Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine; 2007.

        • Etheredge L.M.
        A Rapid-Learning Health System.
        Health Aff. 2007; 26: w107-w118
        • Wennberg J.E.
        • Roos N.
        • Sola L.
        • et al.
        Use of claims data systems to evaluate health care outcomes: mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy.
        JAMA. 1987; 257: 933-936
        • Quam L.
        • Ellis L.
        • Venus P.
        • et al.
        Using claims data for epidemiologic research: the concordance of claims-based criteria with the medical record and patient survey for identifying a hypertensive population.
        Med Care. 1993; 31: 498-507
        • Brook R.H.
        • McGlynn E.A.
        • Cleary P.D.
        Measuring quality of care—part two of six.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 966-970
        • Collen M.F.
        Clinical research databases—a historical review.
        J Med Syst. 1990; 14: 323-344
        • Selby J.V.
        Linking automated databases for research in managed care settings.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 719-724
        • Menachemi N.
        • Ettel D.
        • Brooks R.
        • Simpson L.
        Charting the use of electronic health records and other information technologies among child health providers.
        BMC Pediatr. 2006; 6: 21
        • Feinstein A.R.
        Clinical Epidemiology: The Architecture of Clinical Research.
        W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia1985
      3. Theological & Philosophical Dictionary. Epistemology. Available at http://www.philosophy-dictionary.org/Theological-and-Philosophical-Dictionary/epistemology. Accessed March 18, 2011.

      4. Chen H, Fuller SS, Friedman C, Hersh W. Medical Informatics: Knowledge Management and Data Mining in Biomedicine. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2005.

      5. Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, assoc eds. Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2006.

      6. Lehmann C.U. Kim G.R. Johnson K.B. Pediatric Informatics: Computer Applications in Child Health. Springer, New York2009
        • Christakis D.A.
        • Johnston B.D.
        • Connell F.A.
        Methodologic issues in pediatric outcomes research.
        Ambul Pediatr. 2001; 1: 59-62
      7. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Overview of the Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID). Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/kidoverview.jsp. Accessed January 20, 2011.

      8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health Interview Survey. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. Accessed January 20, 2011.

      9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm. Accessed January 20, 2011.

      10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ambulatory health care data. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd.htm. Accessed January 20, 2011.

      11. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/index.htm. Accessed January 20, 2011.

      12. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Available at: http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/. Accessed January 20, 2011.

        • de Lusignan S.
        • van Weel C.
        The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges.
        Fam Pract. 2006; 23: 253-263
        • Rethans J.J.
        • Martin E.
        • Metsemakers J.
        To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.
        Br J Gen Pract. 1994; 44: 153-156
        • Jeff L.
        • John W.P.
        • Timothy R.D.
        • Martin L.
        • Peter G.
        How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.
        Am J Med. 2000; 108: 642-649
        • McDonald C.J.
        • Overhage J.M.
        • Dexter P.
        • et al.
        A framework for capturing clinical data sets from computerized sources.
        Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 675-682
        • Murphy S.
        Data warehousing for clinical research.
        in: Liu LÖ Tamer M. Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, New York2009: 679-684
        • Lazarus R.
        • Klompas M.
        • Campion F.X.
        • et al.
        Electronic support for public health: validated case finding and reporting for notifiable diseases using electronic medical data.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009; 16: 18-24
        • Nadler J.J.
        • Downing G.J.
        Liberating health data for clinical research applications.
        Sci Transl Med. February 10, 2010; 2 (18cm16–18cm16)
      13. AAP Council on Clinical Information Technology. EMR review project. Available at: http://www.aapcocit.org/emr/readreviews.php. Accessed July 2, 2010.

        • Platt R.
        • Davis R.
        • Finkelstein J.
        • et al.
        Multicenter epidemiologic and health services research on therapeutics in the HMO Research Network Center for Education and Research on therapeutics.
        Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001; 10: 373-377
        • Pace W.D.
        • Cifuentes M.
        • Valuck R.J.
        • et al.
        An electronic practice-based network for observational comparative effectiveness research.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 338-340
        • Brown J.S.P.
        • Holmes J.H.P.
        • Shah K.B.A.
        • et al.
        Distributed health data networks: a practical and preferred approach to multi-institutional evaluations of comparative effectiveness, safety, and quality of care.
        Med Care. 2010; 48: S45-S51
      14. Ware H, Mullett CJ, Jagannathan V. Natural language processing framework to assess clinical conditions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009/8//2009;16:585–589.

        • Jagannathan V.
        • Mullett C.
        • Arbogast J.
        • et al.
        Assessment of commercial NLP engines for medication information extraction from dictated clinical notes.
        Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78: 284-291
      15. i2b2 National Center for Biomedical Computing. i2b2 software version 1.5.1. Available at: https://www.i2b2.org/software/index.html. Accessed August 2, 2010.

        • Hamlin B.W.
        • Biondich P.G.B.
        • Wolfe B.A.
        • et al.
        Cooking up an open source EMR for developing countries: OpenMRS—a recipe for successful collaboration.
        AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006; : 529-533
        • Weinberg S.T.
        Web services can aid development of pediatric-friendly EHRs.
        AAP News. 2009; 30: 27
        • Lovis C.
        • Baud R.
        • Planche P.
        Power of expression in the electronic patient record: structured data or narrative text?.
        Int J Med Inform. 2000; (101–110): 58-59
        • Turchin A.
        • Shubina M.
        • Breydo E.
        • et al.
        Comparison of information content of structured and narrative text data sources on the example of medication intensification.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009; 16: 362-370
        • de Lusignan S.
        • Metsemakers J.
        • Houwink P.
        • et al.
        Routinely collected general practice data: goldmines for research? A report of the European Federation for Medical Informatics Primary Care Informatics Working Group (EFMI PCIWG) from MIE2006, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
        Inform Prim Care. 2006; 14: 203-209
        • Berg M.
        • Goorman E.
        The contextual nature of medical information.
        Int J Med Inform. 1999; 56: 51-60
        • Winthereik B.R.
        “We fill in our working understanding”: on codes, classifications and the produciton of accurate data.
        Methods Inf Med. 2003; 42: 489-496
        • van der Lei J.
        Use and abuse of computer-stored medical records.
        Methods Inf Med. 1991; 30: 79-80
        • McMahon B.
        • Pugh T.
        Epidemiology: Principles and Methods.
        Little, Brown, Boston, Mass1970
        • Slora E.J.
        • Harris D.L.
        • Bocian A.B.
        • Wasserman R.C.
        Pediatric clinical research networks: current status, common challenges, and potential solutions.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 126: 740-745
        • Lindbloom E.J.
        • Ewigman B.G.
        • Hickner J.M.
        Practice-based research networks: the laboratories of primary care research.
        Med Care. 2004; 42: III-45-III-49
      16. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Pediatric Research Consortium (PeRC). Available at: http://www.research.chop.edu/cbmi/perc/percoverview.php. Accessed January 20, 2011.

      17. Maternal and Child Health Bureau Research Program. Pediatric Primary Care Electronic Health Record (EHR) Network for Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER). Available at: http://mchb.hrsa.gov/research/project_info.asp?ID=166. Accessed January 12, 2011.

      18. Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. PECARN current research. Available at: http://www.pecarn.org/currentResearch/index.html. Accessed January 28, 2011.

      19. ImproveCareNow. Enhanced registries grant: building modular chronic disease registries for QI and comparative effectiveness research. Available at: http://www.improvecarenow.org/news/13-latest/77-enhanced-registries-grant-. Accessed January 12, 2011.