Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Early identification of infants with significant hearing loss and the Minnesota Child Development Inventory.Semin Hear. 1995; 16: 124-139
- Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment.N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 2131-2141
- The Colorado Newborn Hearing Screening Project: effects on speech and language development for children with hearing loss.J Perinatol. 2000; 20: S132-137
- A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment.Health Technol Assess. 1997; 1
- Newborn hearing screening in Western Australia.Med J Australia. 2002; 177: 180-185
- Six year effectiveness of a population based two tier infant hearing screening programme.Arch Dis Child. 2002; 86: 245-250
- Improving outcomes for children with permanent congenital hearing impairment. The cases for a national newborn hearing screening and early intervention programme for New Zealand.National Foundation for the Deaf, Auckland2004
- Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.Pediatrics. 2007; 120: 898-921
- Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.Pediatrics. 2008; 122: e266-e276
- Newborn hearing screening vs later hearing screening and developmental outcomes in children with permanent childhood hearing impairment.JAMA. 2010; 304: 1701-1708
- Newborn Hearing Screening: Systematic Evidence Review, No. 5.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD2001
System for information on Grey Literature in Europe (2011), INIST-CNRS - Institut de l’Information Scientifique et Technique, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex-France. Available at: http://www.opengrey.eu. Accessed September 28, 2011.
Grey matters: A practical search tool for evidence-based medicine (2011), Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (2011), Ottawa, Available at: http://www.cadth.ca/en/resources/grey-matters. Accessed September 28, 2011.
- NHS Economic Evaluation Database Handbook.3rd ed. University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination2007
- Incorporating economic evidence.in: Higgins J.P.T. Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Wiley, Chichester2008: 449-476
- Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs.3rd ed. Oxford Medical Publications, Oxford2005
- Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modeling in health technology assessment.Health Technol Assess. 2004; 8 (iii-iv, ix-xi, 1–158)
- Projected cost-effectiveness of state-wide universal newborn hearing screening.Pediatrics. 2002; 110 (885–864)
Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC). Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (Reference 17). Australian Government: Department of Health and Ageing; 2008.
- Screening Newborns for Hearing: The Use of the Automated Auditory Brainstem Response and Otoacoustic Emissions Tests for Newborn Hearing Screening.Edmonton: Institute of Health Economics. 2007;
- Is universal newborn hearing screening more efficient with auditory evoked potentials compared to otoacoustic emissions? [in Spanish].Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2008; 59: 170-175
- Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; : 6
- Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.J Pediatr. 2001; 139: 238-244
- An analysis of the costs of implementing the National Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England.J Med Screen. 2006; 13: 14-19
- Costs of different strategies for neonatal hearing screening: a modelling approach.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001; 85: 177-181
- Hearing-screening: comparative examinations and cost analysis with various devices.Laryngo- Rhino-Otologie. 2000; 79: 453-458
- Newborn hearing screening: costs of establishing a program.J Perinatol. 2002; 22: 120-124
- Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.Laryngoscope. 2005; 115: 1957-1962
- Reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: How and why.Otol Neurotol. 2007; 28: 788-792
- Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 124: 359-367
- Costs and performance of early hearing detection programmes in Lagos, Nigeria.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009; 103: 179-186
- An implementation study of neonatal hearing screening in the Netherlands.Intl J Audiol. 2009; 48: 108-116
- Screening infants for hearing loss—an economic evaluation.J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992; 46: 350-356
- Hearing loss screening in the neonatal intensive care unit auditory brain stem response versus Crib-O-gram, as cost-effectiveness analysis.Ear Hear. 1987; 8: 213-216
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of newborn hearing screening strategies.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000; 154: 484-488
- Economic evaluation of newborn hearing screening: modelling costs and outcomes.Ger Med Sci. 2003; 1 (Doc09)
- Economic Evaluation of Newborn Hearing Screening Procedures.Departamento de Fundamentos del Analisis Economico: Universidad de Alicante, Alicante2002
- A New Outcome Measure for Cost-Utility Analyses of Screening Programs.Departamento de Fundamentos del Analisis Economico: Universidad de Alicante, Alicante2003
- Generalized Cost-Analysis of Screening Programs.Departamento de Fundamentos del Analisis Economico: Universidad de Alicante, Alicante2004
Herrero C, Moreno-Ternero, JD. (2005). Hospital costs and social costs: a case study of newborn hearing screening. Invest Econ. 2005;29:203–216.
- Estimating production costs in the economic evaluation of health-care programs.Health Econ. 2009; 18: 21-35
- Modelling the cost and performance of early identification protocols.J Am Acad Audiol. 1991; 2: 195-205
- Factors that determine the cost and performance of early identification protocols.J Am Acad Audiol. 1992; 3: 223-241
- Comparison of four hearing screening protocols.J Am Acad Audio. 1992; 3: 200-207
- Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: simple, beneficial, and presently justified.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995; 32: 201-211
- A cost-effectiveness analysis of the high risk register and auditory brainstem response.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1996; 38: 115-130
Calculate the cost (2011), National Centre for Hearing Assessment and Management: Utah State University. Available at: http://www.infanthearing.org/resources/cost/index.html. Accessed September 28, 2011.
- Implementation Study: Neonatal Hearing Screening.Dutch Foundation for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Child, Amsterdam2001
- Hearing screening in newborns: Systematic review of accuracy, effectiveness, and effects of interventions after screening.Arch Dis Child. 2010; 95: 130-135
- Universal neonatal hearing screening versus selective screening as part of the management of childhood deafness.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;
- Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, York2008 (University of York)
- Auditory development in early amplified children: factors influencing auditory-based communication outcomes in children with hearing loss.Ear Hear. 2010; 31: 166-185
- Evaluation of the Statewide Infant Screening – Hearing (SWISH Program): Final report.Kent Town: Health Outcomes International. 2011;
- Cost savings from universal newborn hearing screening.Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 1101-1112