Advertisement

Identifying Children at Risk for Being Bullies in the United States

  • Rashmi Shetgiri
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to Rashmi Shetgiri, MD, Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390–9063.
    Affiliations
    Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex

    Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hua Lin
    Affiliations
    Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
    Search for articles by this author
  • Glenn Flores
    Affiliations
    Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex

    Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 17, 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2012.06.013

      Abstract

      Objective

      To identify risk factors associated with the greatest and lowest prevalence of bullying perpetration among U.S. children.

      Methods

      Using the 2001–2002 Health Behavior in School-Aged Children, a nationally representative survey of U.S. children in 6th–10th grades, bivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with any (once or twice or more), moderate (two to three times/month or more), and frequent (weekly or more) bullying. Stepwise multivariable analyses identified risk factors associated with bullying. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified risk factors which, in combination, identify students with the highest and lowest bullying prevalence.

      Results

      The prevalence of any bullying in the 13,710 students was 37.3%, moderate bullying was 12.6%, and frequent bullying was 6.6%. Characteristics associated with bullying were similar in the multivariable analyses and RPA clusters. In RPA, the highest prevalence of any bullying (67%) accrued in children with a combination of fighting and weapon-carrying. Students who carry weapons, smoke, and drink alcohol more than 5 to 6 days/week were at greatest risk for moderate bullying (61%). Those who carry weapons, smoke, have more than one alcoholic drink per day, have above-average academic performance, moderate/high family affluence, and feel irritable or bad-tempered daily were at greatest risk for frequent bullying (68%).

      Conclusions

      Risk clusters for any, moderate, and frequent bullying differ. Children who fight and carry weapons are at greatest risk of any bullying. Weapon-carrying, smoking, and alcohol use are included in the greatest risk clusters for moderate and frequent bullying. Risk-group categories may be useful to providers in identifying children at the greatest risk for bullying and in targeting interventions.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nansel T.R.
        • Overpeck M.
        • Pilla R.S.
        • et al.
        Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment.
        JAMA. 2001; 285: 2094-2100
        • Olweus D.
        Bullying among schoolchildren: intervention and prevention.
        in: Peters R.D. McMahon R.J. Quinsey V.L. Aggression and Violence Throughout the Life Span. Sage Publications, London, England1992: 100-125
        • Olweus D.
        Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do.
        Blackwell Publishers, Inc., Cambridge, Mass1993
        • Smokowski P.R.
        • Kopasz K.H.
        Bullying in school: an overview of types, effects, family characteristics, and intervention strategies.
        Child Sch. 2005; 37: 101-110
        • Farrington D.P.
        • Ttofi M.M.
        Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence and later life outcomes.
        Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011; 21: 90-98
        • Pepler D.
        • Jiang D.
        • Craig W.
        • et al.
        Developmental trajectories of bullying and associated factors.
        Child Dev. 2008; 79: 325-338
        • Craig W.M.
        • Pepler D.J.
        Identifying and targeting risk for involvement in bullying and victimization.
        Can J Psychiatry. 2003; 48: 577-582
        • Pellegrini A.D.
        • Bartini M.
        An empirical comparison of methods of sampling aggression and victimization in school settings.
        J Educ Psychol. 2000; 92: 360-366
        • Sege R.D.
        • Wright J.L.
        • Smith G.A.
        • et al.
        Committee on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention. Policy statement: role of the pediatrician in youth violence prevention.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 393-402
        • Trowbridge M.J.
        • Sege R.D.
        • Olson L.
        • et al.
        Intentional injury management and prevention in pediatric practice: Results from 1998 and 2003 American Academy of Pediatrics periodic surveys.
        Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 100-996
        • Yang S.
        • Kim J.
        • Kim S.
        • et al.
        Bullying and victimization behaviors in boys and girls at South Korean primary schools.
        J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006; 45: 69-77
        • Sourander A.
        • Helstela L.
        Persistence of bullying from childhood to adolescence—a longitudinal 8-year follow-up study.
        Child Abuse Negl. 2000; 24: 873-881
        • Bowes L.
        • Arseneault L.
        • Maughan B.
        • et al.
        School, neighborhood, and family factors are associated with children's bullying involvement: a nationally representative longitudinal study.
        J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009; 48: 545-553
        • Shields A.
        • Cicchetti D.
        Parental maltreatment and emotion dysregulation as risk factors for bullying and victimization in middle childhood.
        J Clin Child Psychol. 2001; 30: 349-363
        • Carlyle K.E.
        • Steinman K.J.
        Demographic differences in the prevalence, co-occurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school.
        J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 623-629
        • Wang J.
        • Iannotti R.J.
        • Nansel T.R.
        School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber.
        J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45: 368-375
        • Nansel T.R.
        • Craig W.
        • Overpeck M.D.
        • et al.
        Health-Behaviour in School-aged Children Bullying Analyses Working Group. Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004; 158: 730-736
        • Spriggs A.L.
        • Iannotti R.J.
        • Nansel T.R.
        • et al.
        Adolescent bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and school relations: commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity.
        J Adolesc Health. 2007; 41: 283-293
      1. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Health Resources and Services Administration. Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Health Behavior in School-Aged Children, 2001–2002 [United States] [Computer File]. ICPSR04372-v2. Ann Arbor, Mich: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]; 2008–07–24. doi:10.3886/ICPSR04372.

        • Solberg M.E.
        • Olweus D.
        Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire.
        Aggress Behav. 2003; 29: 239-268
        • Borup I.
        • Holstein B.E.
        Does poor school satisfaction inhibit positive outcome of health promotion at school? A cross-sectional study of schoolchildren's response to health dialogues with school health nurses.
        J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38: 758-760
        • Schnohr C.W.
        • Kreiner S.
        • Due E.P.
        • et al.
        Differential item functioning of a family affluence scale: validation study on data from HBSC 2001/02.
        Soc Indic Res. 2008; 89: 79-95
        • SAS Institute Inc
        SAS/STAT® 9.1 User's Guide.
        SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC2004 (Available at:) (Accessed December 30, 2009)
        • Feinstein A.R.
        Multivariable Analysis: An Introduction.
        Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn1996 (529–558)
        • Therneau T.M.
        • Atkinson E.J.
        An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning Using the RPART Routines.
        Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN1997 (13)
        • Su X.
        • Azuero A.
        • Cho J.
        • et al.
        An introduction to tree-structured modeling with application to quality of life data.
        Nurs Res. 2011; 60: 247-255
        • Pearson M.R.
        • Kholodkov T.
        • Henson J.M.
        • et al.
        Pathways to early coital debut for adolescent girls: a recursive partitioning analysis.
        J Sex Res. 2012; 49: 13-26
        • Fonarow G.C.
        • Adams K.F.
        • Abraham W.T.
        • et al.
        Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 572-580
        • Nansel T.R.
        • Overpeck M.D.
        • Haynie D.L.
        • et al.
        Relationships between bullying and violence among US youth.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157: 348-353
        • Barker E.D.
        • Arsenault L.
        • Brendgen M.
        • et al.
        Joint development of bullying and victimization in adolescence: relations to delinquency and self-harm.
        J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008; 47: 1030-1038
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        MMWR–Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance–United States, 2009. Surveillance Summaries.
        MMWR. 2010; 59: 1-148
        • Kim M.J.
        • Catalano R.F.
        • Haggerty K.P.
        • et al.
        Bullying at elementary school and problem behavior in young adulthood: a study of bullying, violence and substance use from age 11 to age 21.
        Crim Behav Ment Health. 2011; 21: 136-144
        • Jessor R.
        Adolescent development and behavioral health.
        in: Matarazzo J.D. Weiss S.M. Herd A.J. Miller N.E. Weiss S.M. Behavioral Health. A Handbook of Health Enhancement and Disease Prevention. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY1984: 69-90
        • Elster A.
        • Kuznets N.
        AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS).
        Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md1994
      2. Fleming M. Towey K.J. Limber S.P. Educational Forum on Adolescent Health: Youth Bullying. American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill2002
      3. Farrington DP, Ttofi MM. School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Systematic Review for the Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group, October 31, 2009:1–148. Available at: http://campbellcollaboration.org/lib. Accessed July 9, 2012.

        • Stevens V.
        • De Bourdeaudhuij I.
        • Van Oost P.
        Relationship of the family environment to children's involvement in bully/victim problems at school.
        J Youth Adolesc. 2002; 31: 419-428