Advertisement

Qualitative Abstracts at the Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting: Are They Less Likely to be Accepted for Presentation?

      Abstract

      Objective

      To determine the proportion of abstracts submitted to the 2010 Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) meeting that were exclusively qualitative, and to examine whether these abstracts were more or less likely than all others to be designated as platform, poster, or publish only.

      Methods

      The database of abstracts submitted to the 2010 PAS meeting was searched using qualitative terms. Authors reviewed abstracts to identify exclusively qualitative abstracts. The proportions and mean score ± standard deviation for qualitative abstracts and those designated platform, poster, or publish only were calculated. Student's t test was used to analyze mean differences; pairwise comparisons and odds ratios (ORs) were used to examine differences in the disposition of qualitative versus all other abstracts. The main outcome was the proportion of abstracts designated as platform, poster, or publish only.

      Results

      Of 4057 abstracts, 1.6% used only qualitative methods. Scores for qualitative and all other abstracts were 4.26 ± 0.60 and 3.88 ± 0.92, respectively (P < .001). The disposition of qualitative abstracts among platform, poster, and publish only differed from all other abstracts (P = .04). Compared with all others, qualitative abstracts had lower odds of platform presentation (OR 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15–0.91), demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward publish only (OR 1.6; 95% CI 0.95–2.7), and were equally likely to be posters (OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.65–1.8).

      Conclusions

      Compared with all other abstracts, qualitative abstracts were about 3 times less likely to be chosen for platform presentations; in addition, they demonstrated a trend toward greater odds of publish only. These findings may be the result of inferior quality or an inadequate review process.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • McKibbon K.A.
        • Gadd C.S.
        A quantitative analysis of qualitative studies in clinical journals for the 2000 publishing year.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2004; 4: 11
        • Denzin N.
        • Lincoln Y.
        Handbook of Qualitative Research.
        2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif2000
        • Glaser B.G.
        • Strauss A.L.
        The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
        Aldine Transaction, Hawthorne, NY1967
        • Bradley E.H.
        • Curry L.A.
        • Devers K.J.
        Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.
        Health Serv Res. 2007; 42: 1758-1772
        • Flores G.
        • Abreu M.
        • Brown V.
        • Tomany-Korman S.C.
        How Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program can do a better job of insuring uninsured children: the perspectives of parents of uninsured Latino children.
        Ambul Pediatr. 2005; 5: 332-340
        • Flores G.
        • Abreu M.
        • Chaisson C.E.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial of the effectiveness of community-based case management in insuring uninsured Latino children.
        Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 1433-1441
      1. GovTrack.us. S. 319 (111th). Community Health Workers Act of 2009. Available at: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-319. Accessed February 1, 2011.

        • Colson E.R.
        • McCabe L.K.
        • Fox K.
        • et al.
        Barriers to following the back-to-sleep recommendations: insights from focus groups with inner-city caregivers.
        Ambul Pediatr. 2005; 5: 349-354
        • Colson E.R.
        • Levenson S.
        • Rybin D.
        • et al.
        Barriers to following the supine sleep recommendation among mothers at four WIC centers.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 118: e243-e250
      2. Pediatric Academic Society abstract review guidelines. Available at: http://www.pas-meeting.org/2011Denver/Reviewers/ReviewerGuidelines_2011.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2011.

        • Perneger T.V.
        What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.
        BMJ. 1998; 316: 1236-1238
        • Cox M.K.
        • Key C.H.
        Post hoc pair-wise comparisons for the chi-square test of homogeneity of proportions.
        Educ Psychol Meas. 1993; 53: 951-962
        • Agresti A.
        An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis.
        2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ2007 (30–31)
        • Froom P.
        • Froom J.
        Deficiencies in the structured medical abstracts.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1993; 46: 591-594
        • Taddio A.
        • Pain T.
        • Fassio F.F.
        • et al.
        Quality of non-structured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.
        CMAJ. 1994; 150: 1611-1615
        • Gagliardi A.R.
        • Dobrow M.J.
        Paucity of qualitative research in general medical and health services and policy research journals: analysis of publication rates.
        BMC Health Sci Res. 2011; 11: 268