Advertisement

The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls: A Meta-analysis

Published:November 03, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2014.08.009

      Abstract

      Background

      Research has shown that a clear decline in physical activity among girls starting in early adolescence. Therefore, adolescent girls have been identified as a key target population for physical activity behavior change. The quantification of intervention effectiveness for this group has not been previously reported in a meta-analysis, and this therefore was the objective of the current meta-analysis.

      Study Selection

      Included were interventions in which the main component, or 1 of the components, was aimed at promoting physical activity through behavior change in any setting. Interventions had to include a non–physical activity control group or comparison group, and include a quantitative outcome assessment of physical activity behavior in girls aged 12 to 18 years.

      Data Sources

      Science Direct, PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Libraries, and EPPI Centre databases were searched up to and including May 2013.

      Data Extraction and Synthesis

      Forty-five studies (k = 34 independent samples) were eligible from an initial 13,747 references. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted.

      Results

      The average treatment effect for adolescent girls involved in physical activity interventions was significant but small (g = 0.350, 95% confidence interval 0.12, 0.58, P < .001). Moderator analyses showed larger effects for interventions that were theory based, performed in schools, were girls only, with younger girls, used multicomponent strategies, and involved targeting both physical activity and sedentary behavior.

      Conclusions

      Interventions to increase physical activity in adolescent girls show small but significant effects, suggesting that behavior change may be challenging. Results suggest some approaches that appear to be successful.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Biddle S.J.H.
        • Brehm W.
        • Hopman-Rock M.
        • et al.
        Population physical activity behaviour change: a review for the European College of Sport Science.
        Eur J Sport Sci. 2012; 12: 367-383
        • Dumith S.C.
        • Gigante D.P.
        • Domingues M.R.
        • et al.
        Physical activity change during adolescence: a systematic review and pooled analysis.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2011; 40: 685-698
        • Telama R.
        Tracking of physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a review.
        Obes Facts. 2009; 2: 187-195
        • Stone E.J.
        • McKenzie T.L.
        • Welk G.J.
        • et al.
        Effects of physical activity interventions in youth. Review and synthesis.
        Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15: 298-315
        • Ringuet C.J.
        • Trost S.G.
        Effects of physical activity intervention in youth: a review.
        Int Sports Med J. 2001; 2: 1-10
        • van Sluijs E.M.F.
        • McMinn A.M.
        • Griffin S.J.
        Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials.
        BMJ. 2007; 335: 703
        • Camacho-Minano M.J.
        • LaVoi N.M.
        • Barr-Anderson D.J.
        Interventions to promote physical activity among young and adolescent girls: a systematic review.
        Health Educ Res. 2011; 26: 1025-1049
        • Biddle S.J.
        • Braithwaite R.
        • Pearson N.
        The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity among young girls: a meta-analysis.
        Prev Med. 2014; 62: 119-131
        • Brown A.S.
        Promoting physical activity amongst adolescent girls.
        Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2009; 32: 49-64
        • De Bourdeaudhuij I.
        • Van Cauwenberghe E.
        • Spittaels H.
        • et al.
        School-based interventions promoting both physical activity and healthy eating in Europe: a systematic review within the HOPE project.
        Obes Rev. 2011; 2: 205-216
        • De Meester F.
        • van Lenthe F.
        • Spittaels H.
        • et al.
        Interventions for promoting physical activity among European teenagers: a systematic review.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6: 82
        • DeMattia L.
        • Lemont L.
        • Meurer L.
        Do interventions to limit sedentary behaviours change behaviour and reduce childhood obesity? A critical review of the literature.
        Obes Rev. 2007; 8: 69-81
        • Foley L.
        • Maddison R.
        Use of active video games to increase physical activity in children: a (virtual) reality?.
        Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2010; 22: 7-20
        • Hamel L.M.
        • Robbins L.B.
        • Wilbur J.
        Computer- and Web-based interventions to increase preadolescent and adolescent physical activity: a systematic review.
        J Adv Nurs. 2011; 67: 251-268
        • Jago R.
        • Baranowski T.
        Non-curricular approaches for increasing physical activity in youth: a review.
        Prev Med. 2004; 39: 157-163
        • Lubans D.R.
        • Morgan P.J.
        • Tudor-Locke C.
        A systematic review of studies using pedometers to promote physical activity among youth.
        Prev Med. 2009; 48: 307-315
        • Ogilvie D.
        • Foster C.E.
        • Rothnie H.
        • et al.
        Interventions to promote walking: systematic review.
        BMJ. 2007; 334: 1204
        • Pate R.R.
        • O'Neill J.R.
        After-school interventions to increase physical activity among youth.
        Br J Sports Med. 2009; 43: 14-18
        • Salmon J.
        • Booth M.L.
        • Phongsavan P.
        • et al.
        Promoting physical activity participation among children and adolescents.
        Epidemiol Rev. 2007; 29: 144-159
        • Timperio A.
        • Salmon J.
        • Ball K.
        Evidence-based strategies to promote physical activity among children, adolescents and young adults: review and update.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2004; 7: 20-29
        • Ward D.S.
        • Vaughn A.
        • McWilliams C.
        • et al.
        Interventions for increasing physical activity at child care.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42: 526-534
        • Higgins J.P.
        • Altman D.G.
        • Gotzsche P.C.
        • et al.
        The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928
        • Greenhouse J.B.
        • Iyengar S.
        Sensitivity analysis and diagnostics.
        in: Cooper H. Hedges L.V. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY1994: 383-398
        • Begg C.B.
        Publication bias.
        in: Cooper H. Hedges L.V. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY1994: 400-408
        • Rosenthal R.
        The “file drawer problem” and the tolerance for null results.
        Psychol Bull. 1979; 86: 638-641
        • Light R.J.
        • Pillemer D.B.
        Summing Up the Science of Reviewing Research.
        Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass1984
        • Duval S.
        • Tweedie R.
        Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
        Biometrics. 2000; 56: 455-463
        • Duval S.
        • Tweedie R.
        A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
        J Am Stat Assoc. 2000; 95: 89-98
        • Borenstein M.
        • Hedges L.V.
        • Higgins J.P.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive Meta-analysis, Version 2.
        Biostat, Englewood, NJ2005
        • Borenstein M.
        • Hedges L.V.
        • Higgins J.P.
        • et al.
        A basic introduction to fixed and random effects models for meta-analysis.
        Res Syn Meth. 2010; 1: 97-111
        • Matt G.E.
        • Cook T.D.
        Threats to the validity of research synthesis.
        in: Cooper H. Hedges L.V. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY1994: 503-520
        • Cooper H.
        Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews.
        3rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif1998
        • Hedges L.B.
        • Olkin I.
        Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis.
        Academic Press, Orlando, Fla1985
        • Field A.P.
        Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods.
        Psychol Methods. 2001; 6: 161-180
        • Hedges L.V.
        • Vevea J.L.
        Fixed and random effects models in meta-analysis.
        Psychol Methods. 1998; 3: 486-504
        • Field A.P.
        Can meta-analysis be trusted?.
        Psychologist. 2003; 16: 642-645
        • Field A.P.
        Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary?.
        Psychol Methods. 2005; 10: 444-467
        • Shadish W.R.
        • Sweeney R.B.
        Mediators and moderators in meta-analysis: there's a reason we don't let dodo birds tell us which psychotherapies should have prizes.
        J Consult Clin Psych. 1991; 59: 883-893
        • Borenstein M.
        • Hedges L.V.
        • Higgins J.P.
        • et al.
        Introduction to Meta-analysis.
        Wiley, Chichester, UK2009
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Thompson S.G.
        • Deeks J.J.
        • et al.
        Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
        Brit Med J. 2003; 327: 557-560
        • Slootmaker S.M.
        • Chinapaw M.J.
        • Seidell J.C.
        • et al.
        Accelerometers and Internet for physical activity promotion in youth? Feasibility and effectiveness of a minimal intervention.
        Prev Med. 2010; 51: 31-36
        • Prochaska J.J.
        • Sallis J.F.
        A randomized controlled trial of single versus multiple health behavior change: promoting physical activity and nutrition among adolescents.
        Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 314-318
        • DeBar L.L.
        • Ritenbaugh C.
        • Aickin M.
        • et al.
        Youth: a health plan-based lifestyle intervention increases bone mineral density in adolescent girls.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006; 160: 1269-1276
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ1988
        • Pate R.R.
        • Ward D.S.
        • Saunders R.P.
        • et al.
        Promotion of physical activity among high-school girls: a randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 1582-1587
        • Dishman R.K.
        • Motl R.W.
        • Saunders R.
        • et al.
        Self-efficacy partially mediates the effect of a school-based physical-activity intervention among adolescent girls.
        Prev Med. 2004; 38: 628-636
        • Dishman R.K.
        • Motl R.W.
        • Saunders R.
        • et al.
        Enjoyment mediates effects of a school-based physical-activity intervention.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37: 478-487
        • Jones D.
        • Hoelscher D.M.
        • Kelder S.H.
        • et al.
        Increasing physical activity and decreasing sedentary activity in adolescent girls—The Incorporating More Physical Activity and Calcium in Teens (IMPACT) study.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 42-52
        • Heath G.W.
        • Parra D.C.
        • Sarmiento O.L.
        • et al.
        Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 272-281
        • Beets M.W.
        • Beighle A.
        • Erwin H.E.
        • et al.
        After-school program impact on physical activity and fitness: a meta-analysis.
        Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36: 527-537
        • Bartholomew L.K.
        • Parcel G.S.
        • Kok G.
        • et al.
        Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach.
        2nd ed. John Wiley, San Francisco, Calif2006
        • Bandura A.
        Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.
        Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1986
        • Whitehead S.
        • Biddle S.J.H.
        Adolescent girls' perceptions of physical activity: a focus group study.
        Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2008; 14: 243-262
        • Bayne-Smith M.
        • Fardy P.S.
        • Azzollini A.
        • et al.
        Improvements in heart health behaviors and reduction in coronary artery disease risk factors in urban teenaged girls through a school-based intervention: the PATH program.
        Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 1538-1543
        • Bronikowski M.
        Is sense of coherence needed to keep youth physically active?.
        Medicina Dello Sport. 2010; 63: 465-483
        • Bronikowski M.
        • Bronikowska M.
        Will they stay fit and healthy? A three-year follow-up evaluation of a physical activity and health intervention in Polish youth.
        Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39: 704-713
        • Bush L.P.
        • Laberge S.
        • Laforest S.
        Physical activity promotion among underserved adolescents: “make it fun, easy, and popular.”.
        Health Promot Pract. 2010; 11: 79S-87S
        • Chin A.
        • Paw M.
        • Singh A.S.
        • et al.
        Why did soft drink consumption decrease but screen time not? Mediating mechanisms in a school-based obesity prevention program.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 41
        • Singh A.S.
        • Chin A.P.M.J.
        • Brug J.
        • et al.
        Dutch obesity intervention in teenagers: effectiveness of a school-based program on body composition and behavior.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163: 309-317
        • DeBar L.L.
        • Stevens V.J.
        • Perrin N.
        • et al.
        A primary care-based, multicomponent lifestyle intervention for overweight adolescent females.
        Pediatrics. 2012; 3: e611-e620
        • Dewar D.L.
        • Morgan P.J.
        • Plotnikoff R.C.
        • et al.
        Exploring changes inphysical activity, sedentary behaviors and hypothesized mediatorsin the NEAT girls group randomized controlled trial.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2013; 17: 39-46
        • Dudley D.A.
        • Okely A.D.
        • Pearson P.
        • et al.
        Engaging adolescent girls from linguistically diverse and low income backgrounds in school sport: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2010; 13: 217-224
        • Dunton G.F.
        • Schneider M.
        • Cooper D.M.
        An investigation of psychosocial factors related to changes in physical activity and fitness among female adolescents.
        Psychol Health. 2007; 22: 929-944
        • Everhart B.
        • Harshaw C.
        • Everhart B.
        • et al.
        Multimedia software's effects on high school physical education students' fitness patterns.
        Phys Educat. 2002; 59: 151-157
        • Fairclough S.
        • Stratton G.
        Improving health-enhancing physical activity in girls' physical education.
        Health Educ Res. 2005; 20: 448-457
        • Fairclough S.
        • Stratton G.
        Effects of a physical education intervention to improve student activity levels.
        Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2006; 11: 29-44
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        • Peterson K.
        • Wiecha J.
        • et al.
        Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth—Planet health.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999; 153: 409-418
        • Haerens L.
        • Deforche B.
        • Maes L.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a 2-year physical activity and healthy eating intervention in middle school children.
        Health Educ Res. 2006; 6: 911-921
        • Jago R.
        • Sebire S.J.
        • Cooper A.R.
        • et al.
        Bristol girls dance project feasibility trial: outcome and process evaluation results.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 83
        • Jamner M.S.
        • Spruijt-Metz D.
        • Bassin S.
        • et al.
        A controlled evaluation of a school-based intervention to promote physical activity among sedentary adolescent females: Project FAB.
        J Adolesc Health. 2004; 34: 279-289
        • Graham D.J.
        • Schneider M.
        • Cooper D.M.
        Television viewing: moderator or mediator of an adolescent physical activity intervention?.
        Am J Health Promot. 2008; 23: 88-91
        • Schneider M.
        • Dunton G.F.
        • Bassin S.
        • et al.
        Impact of a school-based physical activity intervention on fitness and bone in adolescent females.
        Phys Act Health. 2007; 4: 1-13
        • Schneider M.
        • Dunton G.F.
        • Cooper D.M.
        Physical activity and physical self-concept among sedentary adolescent females: an intervention study.
        Psychol Sport Exerc. 2008; 9: 1-4
        • Schneider M.
        • Cooper D.M.
        Enjoyment of exercise moderates the impact of a school-based physical activity intervention.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 64
        • Kelder S.H.
        • Perry C.L.
        • Klepp K.I.
        Community-wide youth exercise promotion: long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study.
        J Sch Health. 1993; 63: 218-223
        • Perry C.L.
        • Kelder S.H.
        • Klepp K.I.
        Community-wide cardiovascular disease prevention in young people.
        Eur J Public Health. 1994; 4: 188-194
        • Killen J.D.
        • Telch M.J.
        • Robinson T.N.
        • et al.
        Cardiovascular disease risk reduction for tenth graders. A multiple-factor school-based approach.
        JAMA. 1988; 260: 1728-1733
        • Killen J.D.
        • Robinson T.N.
        • Telch M.J.
        • et al.
        The Stanford Adolescent Heart Health Program.
        Health Educ Q. 1989; 16: 263-283
        • Lubans D.R.
        • Sylva K.
        Mediators of change following a senior school physical activity intervention.
        J Sci Med Sport. 2009; 12: 134-140
        • Sallis J.F.
        • McKenzie T.L.
        • Conway T.L.
        • et al.
        Environmental interventions for eating and physical activity: a randomized controlled trial in middle schools.
        Am J Prev Med. 2003; 24: 209-217
        • McKenzie T.L.
        • Sallis J.F.
        • Prochaska J.J.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a two-year middle-school physical education intervention: M-SPAN.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36: 1382-1388
        • Nader P.R.
        • Sallis J.F.
        • Abramson I.S.
        • et al.
        Family-based cardiovascular risk reduction education among Mexican and Anglo-Americans.
        Fam Community Health. 1992; 15: 57-58
        • Neumark-Sztainer D.
        • Story M.
        • Hannan P.J.
        • et al.
        New Moves: a school-based obesity prevention program for adolescent girls.
        Prev Med. 2003; 37: 41-51
        • Neumark-Sztainer D.R.
        • Friend S.E.
        • Flattum C.F.
        • et al.
        New moves-preventing weight-related problems in adolescent girls a group-randomized study.
        Am J Prev Med. 2010; 39: 421-432
        • Patrick K.
        • Calfas K.J.
        • Norman G.J.
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial of a primary care and home-based intervention for physical activity and nutrition behaviors: PACE+ for adolescents.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006; 160: 128-136
        • Perry C.L.
        • Klepp K.I.
        • Halper A.
        • et al.
        Promoting healthy eating and physical activity patterns among adolescents: a pilot study of “Slice of Life.”.
        Health Educ Res. 1987; 2: 93-103
        • Robbins L.B.
        • Gretebeck K.A.
        • Kazanis A.S.
        • et al.
        Girls on the move program to increase physical activity participation.
        Nurs Res. 2006; 55: 206-216
        • Robbins L.B.
        • Pfeiffer K.A.
        • Maier K.S.
        • et al.
        Pilot intervention to increase physical activity among sedentary urban middle school girls: a two-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design.
        J Sch Nurs. 2012; 28: 302-315
        • Schofield L.
        • Mummery W.K.
        • Schofield G.
        Effects of a controlled pedometer-intervention trial for low-active adolescent girls.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37: 1414-1420
        • Simon C.
        • Wagner A.
        • DiVita C.
        • et al.
        Intervention centred on adolescents' physical activity and sedentary behaviour (ICAPS): concept and 6-month results.
        Int J Obes. 2004; 28: s96-s103
        • Spruijt-Metz D.
        • Nguyen-Michel S.T.
        • Goran M.I.
        • et al.
        Reducing sedentary behavior in minority girls via a theory-based, tailored classroom media intervention.
        Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008; 3: 240-248
        • Taymoori P.
        • Niknami S.
        • Berry T.
        • et al.
        A school-based randomized controlled trial to improve physical activity among Iranian high school girls.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008; 5: 18
        • Winett R.A.
        • Roodman A.A.
        • Winett S.G.
        • et al.
        The effects of the Eat4Life Internet-based health behavior program on the nutrition and activity practices of high school girls.
        J Gender Culture Health. 1999; 3: 239-254
        • Young D.R.
        • Phillips J.A.
        • Yu T.
        • et al.
        Effects of a life skills intervention for increasing physical activity in adolescent girls.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006; 12: 1255-1261