Advertisement

Enrollment, Expenditures, and Utilization After CHIP Expansion: Evidence From Alabama

      Abstract

      Objective

      In October 2009, Alabama expanded eligibility in its Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), known as ALL Kids, from 200% to 300% of the federal poverty level (FPL). We examined the expenditures, utilization, and enrollment behavior of expansion enrollees relative to traditional enrollees (100–200% FPL) and assessed the impact of expansion on total program expenditures.

      Methods

      We compared unadjusted mean person-month-level expenditures and utilization of expansion enrollees and various categories of existing enrollees and used a 2-part modeling strategy to examine differences after controlling for enrollee characteristics. We used probit models to examine adjusted differences in reenrollment behavior by eligibility category.

      Results

      Expansion enrollees had higher total monthly expenditures ($10.33, P < .05) than traditional ALL Kids enrollees, including higher outpatient ($5.35, P < .001) and dental ($0.85, P < .01) expenditures but lower emergency department (−$1.34, P < .001) expenditures. Expansion enrollees had marginally lower utilization of emergency department services for low-severity conditions and higher utilization of physician outpatient visits. Expansion enrollees were 4.47 percentage points (P < .001) more likely to reenroll before their contract expiration date than traditional ALL Kids enrollees. As of October 2012, expansion enrollees accounted for approximately 20% of ALL Kids enrollment and expenditures.

      Conclusions

      The expansion population was characterized by moderately higher health expenditures and utilization, and more persistent enrollment relative to fee group enrollees who are subject to the same levels of cost sharing and annual premiums. Although states are prohibited from changing program eligibility until 2019, the costs associated with the expansion population will be important to future policy decisions.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Kaiser Family Foundation. Where are states today? Medicaid and CHIP eligibility levels for children and non-disabled adults as of January 1, 2014. Available at: http://kff.org/medicaid/fact-sheet/where-are-states-today-medicaid-and-chip. Accessed February 11, 2015.

        • Kaiser Family Foundation
        Understanding the Medicaid and CHIP maintenance of eligibility requirements.
        May 2012 (Available at:) (Accessed February 11, 2015)
        • Cutler D.M.
        • Gruber J.
        Does public insurance crowd-out private insurance.
        Q J Econ. 1996; 111: 391-430
        • Dubay L.
        • Kenney G.
        Did the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women crowd-out private insurance?.
        Health Aff. 1997; 16: 185-193
        • LoSasso A.
        • Buchmueller T.
        The effect of the state children's health insurance program on health insurance coverage.
        J Health Econ. 2004; 23: 1059-1082
        • Gruber J.
        • Simon K.
        Have recent public insurance expansions crowded out private insurance?.
        J Health Econ. 2008; 27: 201-217
        • Gresenz C.R.
        • Edgington S.E.
        • Laugesen M.
        • et al.
        Take-up of public insurance and crowd-out of private insurance under recent CHIP expansions to higher income children.
        Health Serv Res. 2012; 47: 1999-2011
        • Currie J.
        • Gruber J.
        Health insurance eligibility, utilization of medical care, and child health.
        Q J Econ. 1996; 111: 431-466
        • Sommers B.D.
        • Baicker K.
        • Epstein A.M.
        Mortality and access to care among adults after state Medicaid reform.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1025-1034
        • Baicker K.
        • Taubman S.L.
        • Allen H.L.
        • et al.
        The Oregon experiment—effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1713-1722
        • Taubman S.L.
        • Allen H.L.
        • Wright B.J.
        • et al.
        Medicaid increases emergency-department use: evidence from Oregon's Health Insurance Experiment.
        Science. 2014; 343: 263-268
        • Meyer B.D.
        • Wherry L.R.
        Saving teens: using a policy discontinuity to estimate the effects of Medicaid eligibility.
        (NBER Working Paper 18309)August 2012 (Available at:) (Accessed February 11, 2015)
        • Berdahl T.A.
        • Friedman B.S.
        • McCormick M.C.
        • et al.
        Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: trends in racial/ethnic, income, and insurance disparities over time, 2002–2009.
        Acad Pediatr. 2013; 13: 191-203
        • Simpson L.
        • Owens P.L.
        • Zodet M.W.
        • et al.
        Health care for children and youth in the United States: annual report on patterns of coverage, utilization, quality and expenditures by income.
        Ambul Pediatr. 2005; 5: 6-44
        • Fairbrother G.
        • Schuchter J.
        Stability and Churning in Medi-Cal and Healthy Families.
        (Child Policy Research Center, Cincinnatti Children's Hospital Medical Center)2008 (Available at:) (Accessed February 11, 2015)
        • Sen B.
        • Blackburn J.
        • Morrisey M.A.
        • et al.
        Did copayment increases reduce health services usage among CHIP enrollees? Evidence from Alabama.
        Health Serv Res. 2012; 47: 1603-1620
        • Morrisey M.A.
        • Blackburn J.
        • Sen B.
        • et al.
        The effects of premium changes on CHIP enrollment: evidence from Alabama.
        Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012; 2: E1-E17
        • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
        Measures of Pediatric Health Care Quality Based on Hospital Administrative Data: The Pediatric Quality Indicators.
        US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md2006
        • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
        Guide to Prevention Quality Indicators: Hospital Admission for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (Version 3.1).
        US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md2007
        • Billings J.
        • Parikh N.
        • Mijanovich T.
        Emergency department use in New York City: a substitute for primary care?.
        Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2000; 433: 1-5
        • Billings J.
        • Parikh N.
        • Mijanovich T.
        Emergency department use: the New York story.
        Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2000; 434: 1-12
        • Wharam J.F.
        • Landon B.E.
        • Galbraith A.A.
        • et al.
        Emergency department use and subsequent hospitalizations among members of a high-deductible health plan.
        JAMA. 2007; 297: 1093-1102
        • Becker D.J.
        • Blackburn J.
        • Morrisey M.A.
        • et al.
        Co-payments and the use of emergency department services in the Children's Health Insurance Program.
        Med Care Res Rev. 2013; 70: 514-530
        • Belotti F.
        • Deb P.
        • Manning W.G.
        • et al.
        Estimating two-part models.
        Stata J. 2012; 55: 1-13
        • Decker S.L.
        • Kostova D.
        • Kenney G.M.
        • et al.
        Health status, risk factors and medical conditions among persons enrolled in Medicaid vs uninsured low-income adults potentially eligible for Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.
        JAMA. 2013; 309: 2579-2586
        • Hill S.C.
        • Abdus S.
        • Hudson J.L.
        • et al.
        Adults in the income range for the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion are healthier than pre-ACA enrollees.
        Health Aff. 2014; 33: 691-699
        • Holahan J.
        • Kenney G.
        • Pelletier J.
        The health status of new Medicaid enrollees under health care reform.
        (Urban Institute: Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues)2010 (Available at:) (Accessed February 11, 2015)