Abstract
Objective
To examine the cost and cost-effectiveness of implementing Students for Nutrition
and eXercise (SNaX), a 5-week middle school–based obesity-prevention intervention
combining school-wide environmental changes, multimedia, encouragement to eat healthy
school cafeteria foods, and peer-led education.
Methods
Five intervention and 5 control middle schools (mean enrollment, 1520 students) from
the Los Angeles Unified School District participated in a randomized controlled trial
of SNaX. Acquisition costs for materials and time and wage data for employees involved
in implementing the program were used to estimate fixed and variable costs. Cost-effectiveness
was determined using the ratio of variable costs to program efficacy outcomes.
Results
The costs of implementing the program over 5 weeks were $5433.26 per school in fixed
costs and $2.11 per student in variable costs, equaling a total cost of $8637.17 per
school, or $0.23 per student per day. This investment yielded significant increases
in the proportion of students served fruit and lunch and a significant decrease in
the proportion of students buying snacks. The cost-effectiveness of the program, per
student over 5 weeks, was $1.20 per additional fruit served during meals, $8.43 per
additional full-priced lunch served, $2.11 per additional reduced-price/free lunch
served, and $1.69 per reduction in snacks sold.
Conclusions
SNaX demonstrated the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of a middle school–based
obesity-prevention intervention combining school-wide environmental changes, multimedia,
encouragement to eat healthy school cafeteria foods, and peer-led education. Its cost
is modest and unlikely to be a significant barrier to adoption for many schools considering
its implementation.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Academic PediatricsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Nutrition Standards for Food in Schools: Leading the Way Toward Healthier Youth.Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, DC2007 (Available at: http://www.opi.mt.gov/PDF/schoolfood/Wellness/FoodinSchools.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2014)
- Recommendations for prevention of childhood obesity.Pediatrics. 2007; 120: S229-S253
- Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK.Lancet. 2011; 378: 815-825
- How can healthier school snacks and beverages improve student health and help school budgets?2013 (Available at:) (Accessed July 31, 2014)
- Effect of school district policy change on consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among high school students, Boston, Massachusetts, 2004–2006.Prev Chronic Dis. 2011; 8: A74
- Increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables in the school cafeteria: the influence of active choice.J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013; 24: 145-157
- The implementation and effectiveness of school-based nutrition promotion programmes using a health-promoting schools approach: a systematic review.Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16: 1082-1100
- Schools Can Play a Role in Childhood Obesity Prevention.Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC2004 (Available at: https://iom.nationalacademies.org/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2004/Pr. Accessed July 31, 2014)
- Changes in adolescents' intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and sedentary behaviour: results at 8 month mid-way assessment of the HEIA study—a comprehensive, multi-component school-based randomized trial.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 63
- Reducing obesity via a school-based interdisciplinary intervention among youth: Planet Health.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999; 153: 409-418
- Dutch obesity intervention in teenagers: effectiveness of a school-based program on body composition and behavior.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163: 309-317
- Weight status among adolescents in states that govern competitive food nutrition content.Pediatrics. 2012; 130: 437-444
- The cost-effectiveness of a school-based overweight program.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2007; 4: 47
- Economic evaluation of URMEL-ICE, a school-based overweight prevention programme comprising metabolism, exercise and lifestyle intervention in children.Eur J Health Econ. 2013; 14: 185-195
- Economic analysis of a school-based obesity prevention program.Obes Res. 2003; 11: 1313-1324
- Cost-effectiveness of a school-based obesity prevention program.J Sch Health. 2008; 78: 619-624
- Healthy Rewards: Selling healthy snack foods and beverages can be profitable. 2012 (Available at:) (Accessed July 31, 2014)
Budget cuts reach bone for Philadelphia schools. New York Times, June 17, 2013. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/17/education/budget-cuts-reach-bone-for-philadelphia-schools.html. Accessed July 31, 2014.
Budget cuts may threaten city programs for children. New York Times, March 5, 2012. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/nyregion/mayors-budget-cutbacks-may-threaten-city-programs-for-children.html. Accessed July 31, 2014.
- Considerations in Applying Benefit–Cost Analysis to Preventive Interventions for Children, Youth, and Families: Workshop Summary.National Academies Press, Washington, DC2014 (Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18708/considerations-in-applying-benefit-cost-analysis-to-preventive-interventions-for-children-youth-and-families. Accessed July 31, 2014)
- A randomized controlled trial of students for nutrition and exercise: a community-based participatory research study.J Adolesc Health. 2014; 3: 415-422
- Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.Oxford University Press, New York, NY1996
- Cost of talking parents, healthy teens: a worksite-based intervention to promote parent-adolescent sexual health communication.J Adolesc Health. 2013; 53: 595-601
- Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes.3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York2005
- Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data.2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ2008
- Vital signs: obesity among low-income, preschool-aged children-United States, 2008–2011.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013; 62: 629
Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity among children and adolescents: United States, trends 1963–1965 through 2009–2010. National Center for Health Statistics Health E-Stat. September 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity_child_09_10/obesity_child_09_10.pdf. Accessed August 8, 2015.
- Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010.JAMA. 2012; 307: 483-490
- Health consequences of obesity.Arch Dis Child. 2003; 88: 748-752
- [Childhood body mass index and the risk of coronary heart disease in adulthood].Ugeskr Laeger. 2008; 170: 2434-2437
- Childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 473-480
- Tracking of fruit and vegetable consumption from adolescence into adulthood and its longitudinal association with overweight.Br J Nutr. 2007; 98: 431-438
- The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach.J Health Econ. 2012; 31: 219-230
- The economic burden of obesity worldwide: a systematic review of the direct costs of obesity.Obes Rev. 2011; 12: 131-141
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: July 28, 2015
Accepted:
July 26,
2015
Received:
May 16,
2015
Footnotes
Dr Ladapo's work is supported by a K23 Career Development Award (K23 HL116787) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). There are no other financial disclosures to report. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Identification
Copyright
© 2016 Academic Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
