Advertisement

Impact of Childhood Vaccine Discussion Format Over Time on Immunization Status

Published:January 08, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.12.009

      Abstract

      Objective

      Presumptive formats to initiate childhood vaccine discussions (eg, “Well, we have to do some shots”) have been associated with increased vaccine acceptance after one visit compared to participatory formats (eg, “How do you feel about vaccines?”). We characterize discussion format patterns over time and the impact of their repeated use on vaccine acceptance.

      Methods

      We conducted a longitudinal prospective cohort study of children of vaccine-hesitant parents enrolled in a Seattle-based integrated health system. After the child's 2-, 4-, and 6-month visits, parents reported the format their child's provider used to begin the vaccine discussion (presumptive, participatory, or other). Our outcome was the percentage of days underimmunized of the child at 8 months old for 6 recommended vaccines. We used linear regression and generalized estimating equations to test the association of discussion format and immunization status.

      Results

      We enrolled 73 parent–child dyads and obtained data from 82%, 73%, and 53% after the 2-, 4-, and 6-month visits, respectively. Overall, 65% of parents received presumptive formats at ≥1 visit and 42% received participatory formats at ≥1 visit. Parental receipt of presumptive formats at 1 and ≥2 visits (vs no receipt) was associated with significantly less underimmunization of the child, while receipt of participatory formats at ≥2 visits was associated with significantly more underimmunization. Visit-specific use of participatory (vs presumptive) formats was associated with a child being 10.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.3, 19.8; P = .04) more days underimmunized (amounting to, on average, 98 more days underimmunized for all 6 vaccines combined).

      Conclusions

      Presumptive (vs participatory) discussion formats are associated with increased immunization.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gust D.A.
        • Darling N.
        • Kennedy A.
        • et al.
        Parents with doubts about vaccines: which vaccines and reasons why.
        Pediatrics. 2008; 122: 718-725
        • Opel D.J.
        • Taylor J.A.
        • Mangione-Smith R.
        • et al.
        Validity and reliability of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents.
        Vaccine. 2011; 29: 6598-6605
        • Opel D.J.
        • Taylor J.A.
        • Zhou C.
        • et al.
        The relationship between parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey scores and future child immunization status: a validation study.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167: 1065-1071
        • Phadke V.K.
        • Bednarczyk R.A.
        • Salmon D.A.
        • et al.
        Association between vaccine refusal and vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States: a review of measles and pertussis.
        JAMA. 2016; 315: 1149-1158
        • Glanz J.M.
        • Newcomer S.R.
        • Narwaney K.J.
        • et al.
        A population-based cohort study of undervaccination in 8 managed care organizations across the United States.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167: 274-281
        • Glanz J.M.
        • McClure D.L.
        • Magid D.J.
        • et al.
        Parental refusal of varicella vaccination and the associated risk of varicella infection in children.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010; 164: 66-70
        • Glanz J.M.
        • McClure D.L.
        • O'Leary S.T.
        • et al.
        Parental decline of pneumococcal vaccination and risk of pneumococcal related disease in children.
        Vaccine. 2011; 29: 994-999
        • Glanz J.M.
        • Narwaney K.J.
        • Newcomer S.R.
        • et al.
        Association between undervaccination with diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine and risk of pertussis infection in children 3 to 36 months of age.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167: 1060-1064
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Invasive Haemophilus influenzae type B disease in five young children—Minnesota, 2008.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58: 58-60
        • National Vaccine Advisory Committee
        Assessing the state of vaccine confidence in the United States: recommendations from the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on June 10, 2015.
        Public Health Rep. 2015; 130: 573-595
        • Freed G.L.
        • Clark S.J.
        • Butchart A.T.
        • et al.
        Sources and perceived credibility of vaccine-safety information for parents.
        Pediatrics. 2011; 127: S107-S112
        • Fredrickson D.D.
        • Davis T.C.
        • Arnould C.L.
        • et al.
        Childhood immunization refusal: provider and parent perceptions.
        Family Med. 2004; 36: 431-439
        • Opel D.J.
        • Heritage J.
        • Taylor J.A.
        • et al.
        The architecture of provider–parent vaccine discussions at health supervision visits.
        Pediatrics. 2013; 132: 1037-1046
        • Opel D.J.
        • Mangione-Smith R.
        • Robinson J.D.
        • et al.
        The influence of provider communication behaviors on parental vaccine acceptance and visit experience.
        Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: 1998-2004
        • Hofstetter A.M.
        • Robinson J.D.
        • Lepere K.
        • et al.
        Clinician–parent discussions about influenza vaccination of children and their association with vaccine acceptance.
        Vaccine. 2017; 35: 2709-2715
        • Leask J.
        Target the fence-sitters.
        Nature. 2011; 473: 443-445
        • Committee on Infectious Diseases
        • American Academy of Pediatrics
        Recommended childhood and adolescent immunization schedule—United States, 2017.
        Pediatrics. 2017; 139
        • Sudman S.
        • Bradburn N.M.
        Asking Questions.
        Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif1982
        • Dillman D.A.
        Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method.
        2nd ed. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ2007
        • Opel D.J.
        • Robinson J.D.
        • Heritage J.
        • et al.
        Characterizing providers' immunization communication practices during health supervision visits with vaccine-hesitant parents: a pilot study.
        Vaccine. 2012; 30: 1269-1275
        • Burla L.
        • Knierim B.
        • Barth J.
        • et al.
        From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.
        Nurs Res. 2008; 57: 113-117
        • Bernard H.R.
        Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.
        3rd ed. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, Calif2002
        • Groves R.M.
        Survey Methodology.
        J. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ2004
        • DiMatteo M.R.
        • Robinson J.D.
        • Heritage J.
        • et al.
        Correspondence among patients' self-reports, chart records, and audio/videotapes of medical visits.
        Health Commun. 2003; 15: 393-413
        • Jackson M.L.
        • Henrikson N.B.
        • Grossman D.C.
        Evaluating Washington State's immunization information system as a research tool.
        Acad Pediatr. 2014; 14: 71-76
        • Luman E.T.
        • Barker L.E.
        • Shaw K.M.
        • et al.
        Timeliness of childhood vaccinations in the United States: days undervaccinated and number of vaccines delayed.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 1204-1211
        • Harrell F.E.
        Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis.
        Springer-Verlag, New York, NY2011
        • Opel D.J.
        • Mangione-Smith R.
        • Taylor J.A.
        • et al.
        Development of a survey to identify vaccine-hesitant parents: the parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey.
        Hum Vaccin. 2011; 7: 419-425
        • Fitzmaurice G.M.
        • Laird N.M.
        • Ware J.H.
        Applied Longitudinal Analysis.
        2nd ed. Wiley, 2011
        • Sturm L.
        • Donahue K.
        • Kasting M.
        • et al.
        Pediatrician–parent conversations about human papillomavirus vaccination: an analysis of audio recordings.
        J Adolesc Health. 2017; 61: 246-251
        • Brewer N.T.
        • Hall M.E.
        • Malo T.L.
        • et al.
        Announcements versus conversations to improve HPV vaccination coverage: a randomized trial.
        Pediatrics. 2017; 139
        • Leask J.
        • Kinnersley P.
        • Willaby H.W.
        • et al.
        Presumptive initiations in vaccine discussions with parents: acquiescence but at what cost? [E-letter].
        (Pediatrics)2013
        • Baron J.
        • Ritov I.
        Reference points and omission bias.
        Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1994; 59: 475-498
        • Halpern S.D.
        • Ubel P.A.
        • Asch D.A.
        Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 1340-1344
        • Bryant K.A.
        • Wesley G.C.
        • Wood J.A.
        • et al.
        Use of standardized patients to examine physicians' communication strategies when addressing vaccine refusal: a pilot study.
        Vaccine. 2009; 27: 3616-3619
        • Aleccia J.
        Group Health acquisition by Kaiser draws worry and praise.
        (Seattle Times; December 4)2015
        • Strine T.W.
        • Luman E.T.
        • Okoro C.A.
        • et al.
        Predictors of age-appropriate receipt of DTaP dose 4.
        Am J Prev Med. 2003; 25: 45-49