Advertisement

The Use of Experts to Evaluate a Child Abuse Guideline in Community Emergency Departments

Published:November 04, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2020.11.001

      Abstract

      Objective

      Guidelines and pathways exist to help frontline providers evaluate injured children for suspected child abuse. Little, however, is known about whether the decision-making resulting from these interventions is correct. Therefore, in the absence of an available gold-standard test, we used experts’ judgments to examine the appropriateness of these clinical decisions. We evaluated community emergency department (ED) providers’ adherence to a guideline recommending a child protection team (CPT) consultation for infants with injuries associated with abuse. We then compared providers’ decision-making to experts’ recommendations before and after guideline implementation.

      Methods

      Two experts conducted a blinded, retrospective review of injured infants from 3 community EDs (N = 175). Experts rated the likelihood that an injury was abusive, indeterminate, or accidental, and made recommendations that were compared with skeletal survey (SS) testing and child protective services (CPS) reporting by providers before and after guideline implementation.

      Results

      Postguideline implementation, there was a significant increase in CPT consultations in indeterminate cases (14.3% vs 72.2%, P < .001) and in SS testing when experts recommended SS (20.6% vs 56.8%, P = .002). In contrast, a higher percentage of cases for whom the experts did not recommend reporting were reported to CPS (1.8% vs 14.6%, P = .02).

      Conclusions

      Providers consulted the CPT most often for indeterminate cases. SS testing was in line with expert recommendations, but CPS reporting diverged from expert recommendations. Interventions linking community ED providers with a CPT may improve the evaluation of infants with injuries concerning for abuse.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • King WK
        • Kiesel EL
        • Simon HK
        Child abuse fatalities: are we missing opportunities for intervention?.
        Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006; 22: 211-214
        • Niska R
        • Bhuiya F
        • Xu J
        National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary.
        Natl Health Stat Rep. 2010; 26: 1-31
        • Gausche-Hill M
        • Ely M
        • Schmuhl P
        • et al.
        A national assessment of pediatric readiness of emergency departments.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169: 527-534
        • Gausche-Hill M
        • Schmitz C
        • Lewis RJ
        Pediatric preparedness of US emergency departments: a 2003 survey.
        Pediatrics. 2007; 120: 1229-1237
        • Trokel M
        • Waddimba A
        • Griffith J
        • et al.
        Variation in the diagnosis of child abuse in severely injured infants.
        Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 722-728
        • Ravichandiran N
        • Schuh S
        • Bejuk M
        • et al.
        Delayed identification of pediatric abuse-related fractures.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 125: 60-66
        • Ziegler DS
        • Sammut J
        • Piper AC
        Assessment and follow-up of suspected child abuse in preschool children with fractures seen in a general hospital emergency department.
        J Paediatr Child Health. 2005; 41: 251-255
        • Powers E
        • Tiyyagura G
        • Asnes AG
        • et al.
        Early involvement of the child protection team in the care of injured infants in a pediatric emergency department.
        J Emerg Med. 2019; 56: 592-600
        • Stavas N
        • Paine C
        • Song L
        • et al.
        Impact of child abuse clinical pathways on skeletal survey performance in high-risk infants.
        Acad Pediatr. 2020; 20: 39-45
        • Higginbotham N
        • Lawson K
        • Gettig K
        • et al.
        Utility of a child abuse screening guideline in an urban pediatric emergency department.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014; 76: 871-877
        • Rangel E
        • Cook B
        • Bennett B
        • et al.
        Eliminating disparity in evaluation for abuse in infants with head injury: use of a screening guideline.
        J Pediatr Surg. 2009; 44: 1229-1235
        • Rosenthal B
        • Skrbin J
        • Fromkin J
        • et al.
        Integration of physical abuse clinical decision support at 2 general emergency departments.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019; 26: 1020-1029
        • Tiyyagura G
        • Emerson B
        • Gaither JR
        • et al.
        Child protection team consultation for injuries potentially due to child abuse in community emergency departments.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2020; (In press)
        • Louwers EC
        • Korfage IJ
        • Affourtit MJ
        • et al.
        Effects of systematic screening and detection of child abuse in emergency departments.
        Pediatrics. 2012; 130: 457-464
        • Strait RT
        • Siegel RM
        • Shapiro RA
        Humeral fractures without obvious etiologies in children less than 3 years of age: when is it abuse?.
        Pediatrics. 1995; 96: 667-671
        • Thomas SA
        • Rosenfield NS
        • Leventhal JM
        • et al.
        Long-bone fractures in young children: distinguishing accidental injuries from child abuse.
        Pediatrics. 1991; 88: 471-476
        • Buesser KE
        • Leventhal JM
        • Gaither JR
        • et al.
        Inter-rater reliability of physical abuse determinations in young children with fractures.
        Child Abuse Negl. 2017; 72: 140-146
        • Lorenz DJ
        • Pierce MC
        • Kaczor K
        • et al.
        Classifying injuries in young children as abusive or accidental: reliability and accuracy of an expert panel approach.
        J Pediatr. 2018; 198 (144-150.e144)
        • Christian CW
        Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics. The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse.
        Pediatrics. 2015; 135: e1337-e1354
        • Kaczor K
        • Pierce M
        • Lorenz D
        • et al.
        An Analysis of the Impact of Age Threshold on the Performance of a Bruising Clinical Decision Rule (BCDR) for Discriminating Physical Abuse From Accidental Trauma in Infants 0-12 Months of Age.
        Pediatric Academic Societies, San Francisco, Calif2017
        • Pierce MC
        • Kaczor K
        • Aldridge S
        • et al.
        Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 125: 67-74
        • Pierce M
        • Kaczor K
        • Lorenz D
        • et al.
        Bruising Clinical Decision Rule (BCDR) Discriminates Physical child Abuse From Accidental Trauma in Young Children.
        Pediatric Academic Societies, San Francisco, Calif2017
        • Woolf SM
        • Leventhal JM
        • Gaither JR
        • et al.
        Oral injuries in children less than 24 months of age in a pediatric emergency department.
        Child Abuse Negl. 2019; 89: 70-77
        • Dorfman MV
        • Metz JB
        • Feldman KW
        • et al.
        Oral injuries and occult harm in children evaluated for abuse.
        Arch Dis Child. 2018; 103: 747-752
        • Kemp AM
        • Hollén L
        • Emond AM
        • et al.
        Raising suspicion of maltreatment from burns: derivation and validation of the BuRN-tool.
        Burns. 2018; 44: 335-343
        • Flaherty EG
        • Perez-Rossello JM
        • Levine MA
        • et al.
        Evaluating children with fractures for child physical abuse.
        Pediatrics. 2014; 133: e477-e489
        • Deutsch SA
        • Henry MK
        • Lin W
        • et al.
        Quality improvement initiative to improve abuse screening among infants with extremity fractures.
        Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019; 35: 643-650
        • Burns J
        • Rohl S
        • Marth D
        • et al.
        Which clinical features of children on initial presentation to the emergency department with head injury are associated with clinically important traumatic brain injury, classification as abuse, and poor prognosis?.
        Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020; (In press)
        • Pfeiffer H
        • Crowe L
        • Kemp AM
        • et al.
        Clinical prediction rules for abusive head trauma: a systematic review.
        Arch Dis Child. 2018; 103: 776-783
        • Cowley LE
        • Morris CB
        • Maguire SA
        • et al.
        Validation of a prediction tool for abusive head trauma.
        Pediatrics. 2015; 136: 290-298
        • Guenther E
        • Powers A
        • Srivastava R
        • et al.
        Abusive head trauma in children presenting with an apparent life-threatening event.
        J Pediatr. 2010; 157: 821-825
        • Hsieh HF
        • Shannon SE
        Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
        Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277-1288
        • Lane WG
        • Rubin DM
        • Monteith R
        • et al.
        Racial differences in the evaluation of pediatric fractures for physical abuse.
        JAMA. 2002; 288: 1603-1609
        • Wood JN
        • Hall M
        • Schilling S
        • et al.
        Disparities in the evaluation and diagnosis of abuse among infants with traumatic brain injury.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 126: 408-414
        • Hymel KP
        • Laskey AL
        • Crowell KR
        • et al.
        Racial and ethnic disparities and bias in the evaluation and reporting of abusive head trauma.
        J Pediatr. 2018; 198: 137-143.e131
        • Slovis TL
        • Strouse PJ
        • Strauss KJ
        Radiation exposure in imaging of suspected child abuse: benefits versus risks.
        J Pediatr. 2015; 167: 963-968
        • Pless IB
        • Sibald AD
        • Smith MA
        • et al.
        A reappraisal of the frequency of child abuse seen in pediatric emergency rooms.
        Child Abuse Negl. 1987; 11: 193-200
        • Benger JR
        • Pearce V.
        Simple intervention to improve detection of child abuse in emergency departments.
        BMJ. 2002; 324: 780
        • Sidebotham PD
        • Pearce AV.
        Audit of child protection procedures in accident and emergency department to identify children at risk of abuse.
        BMJ. 1997; 315: 855-856
        • Louwers EC
        • Affourtit MJ
        • Moll HA
        • et al.
        Screening for child abuse at emergency departments: a systematic review.
        Arch Dis Child. 2010; 95: 214-218
        • Woodman J
        • Pitt M
        • Wentz R
        • et al.
        Performance of screening tests for child physical abuse in accident and emergency departments.
        Health Technol Assess. 2008; 12 (xi-xiii 1-95): iii