Research Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 2, P319-323, March 2022

Opportunities for Mitigating Bias in the Process and Priorities for Pediatric Chief Resident Selection

Published:December 09, 2021DOI:



      To describe the current processes and priorities for pediatric chief resident (CR) selection, to characterize pediatric CR demographics in the past 5 years nationally, and to identify opportunities for addressing bias in the process of pediatric CR selection.


      We used a cross-sectional study design with an anonymous national survey of pediatric program directors (PDs) through a web-based platform in January 2020.


      A total of 92 of 200 (46%) of PDs responded. About 16% of CR are underrepresented in medicine (UIM) by race/ethnicity. The influential factors most commonly cited in selection were nominations from faculty (84%) and peers (77%), followed by fit with other co-chiefs (68%). Only 17% reported having a specific method to mitigate bias in CR selection, most commonly involving multiple stakeholders in the process.


      Current CR selection relies on processes with the potential to introduce bias. Programs have opportunities to address bias in the CR selection process by reevaluating methods vulnerable to bias, including peer/faculty nominations, fit with peers, ITE scores, and assessments through the use of more objective selection tools.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Lewis D, Paulson E. AAMC proceedings of the diversity and Inclusion Innovation forum: unconscious bias in academic medicine. Fac Bookshelf. 2017. Available at: Accessed June 10, 2020.

        • Marrast LM
        • Zallman L
        • Woolhandler S
        • et al.
        Minority physicians’ role in the care of underserved patients: Diversifying the physician workforce may be key in addressing health disparities.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 289-291
        • Whitla DK
        • Orfield G
        • Silen W
        • et al.
        Educational benefits of diversity in medical school: a survey of students.
        Acad Med. 2003; 78 (Hanley and Belfus Inc.): 460-466
        • Price EG
        • Gozu A
        • Kern DE
        • et al.
        The role of cultural diversity climate in recruitment, promotion, and retention of faculty in academic medicine.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20: 565-571
      2. Association of American Medical Colleges. Association of American Medical Colleges: U.S. medical school faculty by rank and race/ethnicity. Available at: Accessed April 21, 2019.

      3. Association of American Medical Colleges. Holistic review | AAMC. Available at: Accessed September 19, 2021.

        • Boatright D
        • Ross D
        • O'Connor P
        • et al.
        Racial disparities in medical student membership in the alpha omega alpha honor society.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177: 659-665
        • Burkhardt JC
        • Parekh KP
        • Gallahue FE
        • et al.
        A critical disconnect: residency selection factors lack correlation with intern performance.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2020; 12: 696-704
      4. Limesurvey GmbH. LimeSurvey: an open source survey tool. LimeSurvey GmbH. Available at: Accessed October 10, 2020.

      5. Shellenbarger S. The dangers of hiring for cultural fit. Wall Street Journal. Available at: Published September 23, 2019. Accessed July 24, 2020.

        • Althouse LA
        • McGuinness GA.
        The in-training examination: an analysis of its predictive value on performance on the general pediatrics certification examination.
        J Pediatr. 2008; 153: 425-428
        • Powers A
        • Gerull KM
        • Rothman R
        • et al.
        Race- and gender-based differences in descriptions of applicants in the letters of recommendation for orthopaedic surgery residency.
        JBJS Open Access. 2020; 5e20.00023–e20.00023
        • Grimm LJ
        • Redmond RA
        • Campbell JC
        • et al.
        Gender and racial bias in radiology residency letters of recommendation.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2020; 17: 64-71
        • Barceló NE
        • Shadravan S
        • Wells CR
        • et al.
        Reimagining merit and representation: promoting equity and reducing bias in GME through holistic review.
        Acad Psychiatry. 2021; 45: 34-42
        • Capers Q
        • McDougle L
        • Clinchot DM.
        Strategies for achieving diversity through medical school admissions.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018; 29: 9-18
        • Mendoza FS
        • Walker LR
        • Stoll BJ
        • et al.
        Diversity and inclusion training in pediatric departments.
        Pediatrics. 2015; 135: 707-713
        • Montez K
        • Omoruyi EA
        • McNeal-Trice K
        • et al.
        Trends in race/ethnicity of pediatric residents and fellows: 2007-2019.
        Pediatrics. 2021; 148
      6. Association of American Medical Colleges. US Medical School faculty be sex, race/ethnicity, rank, and department, 2018; 2020.