Advertisement

Using Self-Determination Theory to Drive an Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum for Pediatric Residents: A Mixed Methods Study

Published:December 17, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.018

      Abstract

      Objective

      The ability to incorporate evidence-based medicine (EBM) into clinical practice is an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competency, yet many pediatric residents have limited knowledge in this area. The objective of this study is to describe the effect of an EBM curriculum on resident attitudes and clinical use of EBM.

      Methods

      We implemented a longitudinal EBM curriculum to review key literature and guidelines and teach EBM principles. In this Institutional Review Board-exempt mixed methods study, we surveyed residents, fellows, and faculty about resident use of EBM at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention. We conducted point prevalence surveys of faculty about residents’ EBM use on rounds. Residents participated in focus groups, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using conventional content analysis to develop themes.

      Results

      Residents (N = 61 pre- and 70 post-curriculum) reported an increased appreciation for the importance of EBM and comfort generating a search question. Faculty reported that residents cited EBM on rounds, with an average of 2.4 citations/week. Cited evidence reinforced faculty's plans 79% of the time, taught faculty something new 57% of the time, and changed management 21% of the time. Focus groups with 22 trainees yielded 4 themes: 1) increased competence in understanding methodology and evidence quality; 2) greater autonomy in application of EBM; 3) a call for relatedness from faculty role models and a culture that promotes EBM; and 4) several barriers to successful use of EBM.

      Conclusions

      After implementation of a longitudinal EBM curriculum, trainees described increased use of EBM in clinical practice.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nelson B.
        • Ingard C.
        • Nelson D.
        Teaching trainees how to critically evaluate the literature—a crossover study at two pediatric residency programs.
        Int J Med Educ. 2017; 8: 137-141https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.58ce.5f04
        • Bream E.N.
        • Ponitz K.
        • Myers R.
        Improving evidence based medicine skills.
        Acad Pediatr. 2016; 16: e34https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.05.081
        • Chitkara M.B.
        • Boykan R.
        • Messina C.R.
        A longitudinal practical evidence-based medicine curriculum for pediatric residents.
        Acad Pediatr. 2016; 16: 305-307https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.013
        • Allan G.M.
        • Korownyk C.
        • Tan A.
        • et al.
        Developing an integrated evidence-based medicine curriculum for family medicine residency at the University of Alberta.
        Acad Med. 2008; 83 (PMID: 18520465): 581-587https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181723a5c
        • Kersten H.B.
        • Randis T.M.
        • Giardino A.P.
        Evidence-based medicine in pediatric residency programs: where are we now?.
        Ambul Pediatr. 2005; 5: 302-305https://doi.org/10.1367/A04-182R1.1
        • Soma D.B.
        • Homme J.H.
        • Jacobson R.M.
        Using tablet computers to teach evidence-based medicine to pediatrics residents: a prospective study.
        Acad Pediatr. 2013; 13: 546-550https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2013.05.028
        • Vu T.
        • Alexander B.
        • Skey D.
        • et al.
        P-value: a novel, resident-driven, interactive evidence-based medicine curriculum increases EBM knowledge and confidence (Research Abstract).
        Acad Pediatr. 2017; 17: e14https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.058
        • Aneese A.M.
        • Nasr J.A.
        • Halalau A.
        A prospective mixed-methods study evaluating the integration of an evidence based medicine curriculum into an internal medicine residency program.
        Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019; 10 (PMID: 31413652; PMCID: PMC6659792): 533-546https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S203334
        • Korenstein D.
        • Dunn A.
        • McGinn T.
        Mixing it up: integrating evidence-based medicine and patient care.
        Acad Med. 2002; 77: 741-742https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200207000-00028
        • Ten Cate T.J.
        • Kusurkar R.A.
        • Williams G.C.
        How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59.
        Med Teach. 2011; 33: 961-973https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595435
        • Moriarty J.A.
        • Vellanki S.
        • Trope L.A.
        • et al.
        Righting the autonomy-supervision pendulum: understanding the impact of independent rounds on medical students, residents, and faculty.
        Acad Med. 2020; 95 (11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Research in Medical Education Presentations)): S28-S36https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003645
        • Sackett D.L.
        • Rosenberg W.M.
        • Gray J.A.
        • et al.
        Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.
        BMJ. 1996; 312: 71-72https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
      1. Nursing Research: PICO and evidence based practice-types of studies. Available at: https://library.triton.edu/c.php?g=433673&p=3720267 Accessed June 20, 2019.

        • Kirkpatrick D.L.
        • Kirkpatrick J.D.
        Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels.
        3rd ed. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA2006
        • Hsieh H.-F.
        • Shannon S.E.
        Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
        Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277-1288https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687