If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Corresponding Author. Anelah McGinness, MD, Permanent address: 11135 Taloncrest Way Unit 23, San Diego 92126, Phone Number: 951-385-0718, Fax: 949-812-6230
Despite extensive literature measuring the prevalence and the consequences of burnout among resident physicians, effective interventional controlled trials are lacking.
Mindfulness, therapy, and schedule changes have shown small benefits, but require learning a new skill, significant institutional resources, or organizational change.
(G/3GT) journaling are low-cost, individual-level interventions that have been shown to significantly improve measures of burnout, happiness, depression, gratitude, and stress; studies so far have not focused on resident burnout.
ADAIR, K. C.; KENNEDY, L. A.; SEXTON, J. B. Three Good Tools: Positively reflecting backwards and forwards is associated with robust improvements in well-being across three distinct interventions. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707, 9 Jul 2020 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707.
Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
We piloted an app-based G/3GT journaling intervention for four weeks with pediatric residents measuring adherence and burnout as primary outcomes, with gratitude and life satisfaction as secondary outcomes.
Educational Approach and Innovation
Setting and Participants
All pediatric residents (n=83) at University of California San Francisco Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland during the academic year of 2020-2021 were eligible for the study. Due to the growing evidence supporting the benefits of G/3GT journaling in other healthcare settings,
ADAIR, K. C.; KENNEDY, L. A.; SEXTON, J. B. Three Good Tools: Positively reflecting backwards and forwards is associated with robust improvements in well-being across three distinct interventions. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707, 9 Jul 2020 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707.
Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
we did not randomize participants due to concerns that it was unethical to deny participants seeking an evidence-based intervention for burnout. Participants were able to opt into the intervention (n=20) or control group (n=21) using survey links distributed in flyers, emails, and social media posts. Each resident received $5 per completed survey and the journaling group received $50 for the intervention, totaling $25 for control, $70 for journaling (supplemental figure). Enrollment was closed when we reached the limits of our gift card budget. Given our small sample size, to protect anonymity participant ID codes were not assigned, thus it was not possible for study organizers to track the burnout responses of an individual.
Intervention
In October 2020, using an app, the journaling group listed three things they were grateful for and three good things daily for four weeks. Journaling participants were sent an app set-up guide and instructed to turn on daily reminder notifications to the time(s) of their choosing. Residents received no further education or training on gratitude, three good things journaling, or resilience.
Both intervention and control groups filled out surveys before, during, and up to six months after the intervention (supplemental figure).
Measured Outcomes
Each survey measured burnout, feasibility, gratitude, and life satisfaction. Burnout was measured using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI)
Feasibility was defined as adherence to journaling at least five days per week of the intervention period, monitored by deidentified app screenshots. Gratitude was measured using the Six-Item Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6).
We anticipated and accounted for baseline differences in our control and journaling groups by using a difference-in-difference multivariate regression, allowing us to compare the magnitudes of the changes in burnout, gratitude, and life satisfaction between the groups. Cronbach's Alpha was used to evaluate internal consistency of the surveys. Cohen's d effect size was used to standardize comparisons of differences between groups for the multiple scales used.
Results
Study Participants
Compared to controls, a higher proportion of journaling participants were PGY-3 residents (p<0.01). Additionally, many in the journaling group reported accessing a therapist (p=0.06), meditation/mindfulness apps (p=0.06), and self-guided mediation (p=0.07) although these did not reach significance. Baseline participant characteristics were otherwise similar between groups (supplemental table).
Feasibility, Burnout, Life Satisfaction, and Gratitude
Feasibility, measured as journaling adherence over the four-week intervention, was 85% (17/20). The percentage of journaling participants who continued to journal at one month post-intervention was 31% (5/16); 7% (1/16) at six months post-intervention. Survey response rate in the control group was 84% (87/105) and 87% (87/100) in the journaling group.
Baseline levels and trends in burnout, life satisfaction, and gratitude over the course of the study period are shown in Figure 1A-E. Difference-in-difference analysis (Figure 1F) showed that the journaling group had a statistically significant decrease in OLBI-Exhaustion (p=0.025) compared to the control group and this trend persisted up to 6 months after the intervention ended. There were no statistically significant changes in OLBI-Disengagement (p=0.055), PWLS (p=0.201), SWLS (p=0.446), or GQ-6 (p=0.939) (Figure 1). Cronbach's alpha (>0.6 for all) and power calculations (>80% for all scales) are shown in Figure 1F.
Fig 1Relationship between burnout and wellness over time, journaling (n=20) vs
In this single-center non-randomized controlled intervention, G/3GT journaling was low-cost, feasible, and effective in decreasing pediatric resident burnout.
Distinct from prior 3GT studies, our pilot focused on resident physicians and had a control group.
ADAIR, K. C.; KENNEDY, L. A.; SEXTON, J. B. Three Good Tools: Positively reflecting backwards and forwards is associated with robust improvements in well-being across three distinct interventions. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707, 9 Jul 2020 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707.
Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
Our effect size, a roughly 10% decrease in one measure of burnout from baseline to six months post-intervention, was small, but persisted months after intervention and is comparable in magnitude to prior studies.
ADAIR, K. C.; KENNEDY, L. A.; SEXTON, J. B. Three Good Tools: Positively reflecting backwards and forwards is associated with robust improvements in well-being across three distinct interventions. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707, 9 Jul 2020 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707.
Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
It is unclear why we did not see improvements in our other two measures of burnout, although notably OLBI-Disengagement had a p-value that trended very close to significance. The PWLS is a single question, and although it is useful as a screening tool for burnout, prior studies have shown it has reduced sensitivity to smaller changes in degrees of burnout.
ADAIR, K. C.; KENNEDY, L. A.; SEXTON, J. B. Three Good Tools: Positively reflecting backwards and forwards is associated with robust improvements in well-being across three distinct interventions. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707, 9 Jul 2020 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707.
Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
we did not see improvements in other positive measures. Given that our initial levels of gratitude and satisfaction were high, it is possible that we were not able to detect small changes given our variance and small sample size.
Continued journaling after the incentive period was not expected or encouraged, because we anticipated results would persist months after journaling stopped - as seen with prior 1-2 week 3GT interventions.
ADAIR, K. C.; KENNEDY, L. A.; SEXTON, J. B. Three Good Tools: Positively reflecting backwards and forwards is associated with robust improvements in well-being across three distinct interventions. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707, 9 Jul 2020 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707.
Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
While only a third journaled beyond the incentive period in our study, benefits endured 6 months afterwards. We believe adherence would have been lower if participation were compulsory or unincentivized;
Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
thus we encourage institutions with available funding to offer G/3GT journaling incentive programs given evidence that combining individual with organizational level solutions may be more effective for resident and physician burnout.
Since the study was performed at our home institution, and the participant group received varied financial incentives, participant, response, or extrinsic incentive bias could impact our results. We chose the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory because it was free, validated in healthcare workers,
and familiar to our residency (previously used as a biannual self-screening tool). However, our effect size may be difficult to compare to other studies using the proprietary Maslach.
MASLACH, C.; JACKSON, S.; LEITER, M. The Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. In: ZALAQUETT, C. P. e WOOD, R. J. (Ed.). 3. Palo Alto, CA: The Scarecrow Press, 1997. p.191-218.
which showed that PGY-3’s had lower levels or similar levels of burnout to PGY-1’s, baseline burnout was higher in the group with majority PGY-3’s – the journaling group. Many discounted or free wellness services were marketed to healthcare workers in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, concurrently with our study, which may have contributed to the increased use of wellness resources in the journaling group compared to the controls. We cannot exclude the possibility that those who opted to journal were more motivated to seek multiple tools to improve their mental health. It is also possible that meditation or therapy may have enhanced the effect of G/3GT journaling or vice-versa.
Next Steps
Our results are promising and could help address a recognized problem in the medical education community. Larger controlled trials of residents at different institutions and specialties are needed to validate the results of our pilot.
Supplemental Content
Supplemental file 1: Supplemental methods chart
Acknowledgements
Financial support: This work was supported by the Masters of Positive Psychology Alumni Association, Philadelphia, PA [grant number: NA]. The senior author, SN, is a graduate of the U Penn Masters of Positive Psychology Program. The Alumni Association had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of this manuscript; nor in the decision to submit the article for publication. Access to Qualtrics for this project and HIPPA compliant data storage was supported by University of California, San Francisco.
Authorship statement
AM, MR, and SN conceived the study design. AM designed the survey tools, gathered all data, performed preliminary data analysis, and created figures. DS performed statistical analysis and created figures. SN, AM, MR, and DS contributed to drafting of the article and substantially revised it and approved the final version for submission.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Augusta Saulys and Dr. Celeste Allen for their guidance, mentorship, and moral support.
Results of detailed statistical analysis and copies of survey instruments can be made available upon reasonable request from the authors.
Declarations of Interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests. The app used in this study, 5 Minute Journal, was created by Intelligent Change. The authors received no incentives and are not affiliated in any way with Intelligent Change. Since the intervention described in this study was completed, major revisions of the 5 Minute Journal app have been made by Intelligent Change and the app now requires a yearly subscription. The authors would like to note that there are many alternative gratitude and 3 good things journaling apps with various features and user interfaces available for free or less than $6.
Funding
This work was supported by the Masters of Positive Psychology Alumni Association, Philadelphia, PA [grant number: NA]. The senior author, SN, is a graduate of the U Penn Masters of Positive Psychology Program. The Alumni Association had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; nor in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author Contributions
AM, MR, and SN conceived the study design. AM designed the survey tools, gathered all data, performed preliminary data analysis, and created figures. DS performed statistical analysis and created figures. SN, AM, MR, and DS contributed to drafting of the article and substantially revised it and approved the final version for submission.
ADAIR, K. C.; KENNEDY, L. A.; SEXTON, J. B. Three Good Tools: Positively reflecting backwards and forwards is associated with robust improvements in well-being across three distinct interventions. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707, 9 Jul 2020 2020. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2020.1789707.
Forty-five good things: a prospective pilot study of the Three Good Things well-being intervention in the USA for healthcare worker emotional exhaustion, depression, work–life balance and happiness.
MASLACH, C.; JACKSON, S.; LEITER, M. The Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. In: ZALAQUETT, C. P. e WOOD, R. J. (Ed.). 3. Palo Alto, CA: The Scarecrow Press, 1997. p.191-218.
00246-7&id=gr1.jpg){kind=link}