Advertisement

A Mixed-Methods Investigation Examining Site-Level Variation in Reach Out and Read Implementation

Published:December 07, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2022.11.015

      Abstract

      Objective

      Reach Out and Read (ROR) is an evidence-based early childhood intervention that has been implemented at scale, yet description of ROR implementation is inconsistent. This study engages implementation science to examine ROR delivery and site-level variation.

      Methods

      As part of an ongoing clinical trial, we conducted a mixed-methods study in 3 community health centers (CHCs) that serve low-income Latino families. We integrated quantitative parent survey data, qualitative data from monthly key informant interviews with ROR site leaders over 1 year, and in-depth interviews with 18 additional clinicians. At enrollment, parents reported whether they received a children's book, guidance on reading, and modeling from clinicians. We analyzed quantitative data using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data iteratively engaging emergent and a priori codes drawn from the Template for Intervention Description and Replication Checklist.

      Results

      Three hundred Latino parents (mean age: 31; 75% ≤HS education) completed surveys. The mean child age was 8 months. Overall, most parents reported receiving a book (84%) and guidance (73%), but fewer experienced modeling (23%). Components parents received varied across CHCs. Two themes emerged to explain the variation observed: 1) differences in the perceived purpose of shared reading and book delivery aligned with variation in implementation, and 2) site-level barriers affected what components were implemented.

      Conclusion

      Because of substantive variation in ROR implementation across sites, systematic descriptions using established frameworks and corresponding measurement to characterize ROR implementation may enhance our understanding of mechanisms underlying ROR's effects, which clinicians and policymakers can use to maximize ROR's impact.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Pediatrics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Reardon SF
        • Portilla XA.
        Recent trends in income, racial, and ethnic school readiness gaps at kindergarten entry.
        AERA Open. 2016; 2https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416657343
        • Richter LM
        • Daelmans B
        • Lombardi J
        • et al.
        Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale up for early childhood development.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 103-118
      1. Dorn E, Hancock B, Sarakatsannis J, et al. COVID-19 and learning loss—disparities grow and students need help 2020. 2020. Available at:https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/covid-19-and-learning-lossdisparities-grow-and-students-need-help. Accessed December 10, 2020.

        • Knudsen EI
        • Heckman JJ
        • Cameron JL
        • et al.
        Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America's future workforce.
        Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103: 10155-10162
        • Shonkoff JP
        • McCoy DC.
        Raising the bar for evaluating effectiveness of early childhood interventions.
        Pediatrics. 2021; 148e2021052326https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052326
        • Xie Y
        • Near C
        • Xu H
        • et al.
        Heterogeneous treatment effects on children's cognitive/non-cognitive skills: a reevaluation of an influential early childhood intervention.
        Soc Sci Res. 2020; 86102389
        • Hoffmann TC
        • Glasziou PP
        • Boutron I
        • et al.
        Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.
        Br Med J. 2014; 348: g1687
        • Schindler HS
        • McCoy DC
        • Fisher PA
        • et al.
        A historical look at theories of change in early childhood education research.
        Early Child Res Q. 2019; 48: 146-154
        • Cates CB
        • Weisleder A
        • Dreyer BP
        • et al.
        Leveraging healthcare to promote responsive parenting: impacts of the video interaction project on parenting stress.
        J Child Fam Stud. 2016; 25: 827-835
        • Zuckerman B
        • Needlman R.
        30 years of Reach Out and Read: need for a developmental perspective.
        Pediatrics. 2020; 145e20191958https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1958
        • Sharif I
        • Rieber S
        • Ozuah PO.
        Exposure to Reach Out and Read and vocabulary outcomes in inner city preschoolers.
        J Natl Med Assoc. 2002; 94: 171-177
        • Mendelsohn AL
        • Mogilner LN
        • Dreyer BP
        • et al.
        The impact of a clinic-based literacy intervention on language development in inner-city preschool children.
        Pediatrics. 2001; 107: 130-134
        • Walton H
        • Spector A
        • Williamson M
        • et al.
        Developing quality fidelity and engagement measures for complex health interventions.
        Br J Health Psychol. 2020; 25: 39-60
        • Wiltsey Stirman S
        • Baumann AA
        • Miller CJ.
        The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions.
        Implement Sci. 2019; 14: 58
        • Uthirasamy N
        • Reddy M
        • Hemler JR
        • et al.
        Reach out and read implementation: a scoping review [published online ahead of print, 2022 Dec 1].
        Acad Pediatr. 2022; S1876-2859(22)00572-1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2022.11.012
        • Brownson RC
        • Colditz GA
        • Proctor EK.
        Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice.
        2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY2018: 19-45
        • Palinkas LA
        • Aarons GA
        • Horwitz S
        • et al.
        Mixed method designs in implementation research.
        Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38: 44-53
        • Crabtree BF
        • Miller WL.
        Doing Qualitative Research.
        3rd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif2022
        • Zuckerman B
        • Augustyn M.
        Books and reading: evidence-based standard of care whose time has come.
        Acad Pediatr. 2011; 11: 11-17
        • Needlman R
        • Toker KH
        • Dreyer BP
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of a primary care intervention to support reading aloud: a multicenter evaluation.
        Ambul Pediatr. 2005; 5: 209-215
        • Golova N
        • Alario AJ
        • Vivier PM
        • et al.
        Literacy promotion for Hispanic families in a primary care setting: a randomized, controlled trial.
        Pediatrics. 1999; 103: 993-997
        • High PC
        • LaGasse L
        • Becker S
        • et al.
        Literacy promotion in primary care pediatrics: can we make a difference?.
        Pediatrics. 2000; 105: 927-934
        • Needlman R
        • Silverstein M.
        Pediatric interventions to support reading aloud: how good is the evidence?.
        J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2004; 25: 352-363
        • Erickson E
        • Caldwell A
        • Shearman N
        • et al.
        Clinician experiences with Reach Out and Read: an exploratory qualitative analysis.
        Acad Pediatr. 2021; 21: 961-967
        • King TM
        • Muzaffar S
        • George M.
        The role of clinic culture in implementation of primary care interventions: the case of Reach Out and Read.
        Acad Pediatr. 2009; 9: 40-46
        • Khandekar AA
        • Augustyn M
        • Sanders L
        • et al.
        Improving early literacy promotion: a quality-improvement project for Reach Out and Read.
        Pediatrics. 2011; 127: e1067-e1072
        • O'Connell ME
        • Boat T
        • et al.
        • National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Prevention of Mental Disorders and Substance Abuse Among Children, Youth, and Young Adults: Research Advances and Promising Interventions
        Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities.
        National Academies Press (US), Washington, DC2009https://doi.org/10.17226/12480 (Available at:)
      2. National Center ROR. Our next chapter. 2022. Available at: https://reachoutandread.org/what-we-do/next-chapter/. Accessed September 1, 2022.

        • Caldwell A
        • Erickson E
        • Shearman N
        • et al.
        Literacy promotion training and implementation in pediatric continuity clinics.
        Acad Pediatr. 2020; 20: 1013-1019
        • Erickson E
        • Caldwell A
        • Shearman N
        • et al.
        Clinician perceptions on literacy promotion in pediatric continuity clinics.
        Acad Pediatr. 2022; 22: 1192-1199https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2022.05.021
        • Needlman R
        • Lone Z
        • Chae R
        • et al.
        Literacy promotion strategies within Reach Out and Read: an exploratory study.
        Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018; 57: 1326-1331