Abstract
Objective
The estimated prevalence of learning disabilities (LDs) is nearly 8% of all children.
Fewer than 5% of all children are diagnosed in public schools, jeopardizing remediation.
We aimed to identify barriers affecting front-line child-facing professionals in detecting
LDs in school-aged children.
Methods
We conducted a qualitative study with individual interviews of 40 professionals from
different areas of the United States identified through theoretical sampling (20 educators,
10 pediatricians, and 10 child mental health clinicians). Clinicians represented academic
and community settings, and educators represented public, private, and charter schools.
Twenty had expertise in assessing LDs; 20 were generalists without specific training.
We also endeavored to maximize representation across age, gender, race and ethnicity,
and location. We analyzed transcripts utilizing grounded theory and identified themes
reflecting barriers to detection.
Results
Themes and sub-themes included: 1) areas requiring improved professional education
(misconceptions that may hinder detection, confounding factors that may mask LDs,
and need for increasing engagement of parents or guardians in identifying LDs) and
2) systemic barriers (time constraints that limited professionals’ ability to advocate
for children and to delve into their emotional experiences, inconsistent guidelines
across institutions and inconsistent perceptions of professional responsibility for
detection, and confusion surrounding screening tools and lack of screening by some
professionals in the absence of overt problems).
Conclusions
Clinicians and other child-facing professionals may benefit from augmented training
in screening and identification and enhanced evidence-based and institutional guidance.
These efforts could increase efficiency and perceived responsibility for recognition
and improve earlier detection.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Academic PediatricsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in adult health behaviors among U.S. states, 1990-2004.Public Health Rep. 2007; 122: 177-189
- Learning disabilities and school failure.Pediatr Rev. 2011; 32: 315-324
- School-aged children who are not progressing academically: considerations for pediatricians.Pediatrics. 2019; 144e20192520
- Profiles of college students demonstrating learning disabilities with and without giftedness.J Learn Disabil. 1997; 30: 552-559
- Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with written language disability.Gifted Child Q. 2010; 54: 102-115
- Prevalence and trends of developmental disabilities among children in the United States: 2009-2017.Pediatrics. 2019; 144e20190811
- Digest of Education Statistics 2019 (NCES 2021-009).National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC2021
- Evaluating the impact of dyslexia laws on the identification of specific learning disability and dyslexia.Ann Dyslexia. 2017; 67: 356-368
- Suicide attempts among individuals with specific learning disorders: an underrecognized issue.J Learn Disabil. 2018; 51: 283-292
- Reading disability and adult attained education and income: evidence from a 30-year longitudinal study of a population-based sample.J Learn Disabil. 2014; 47: 374-386
- Impact of the time of diagnosis on the perceived competence of adolescents with dyslexia.Learn Disabil Q. 2018; 41: 170-178
- Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions.School Psych Rev. 2019; 36: 541-561
- Unidentified language deficits in children with emotional and behavioral disorders: a meta-analysis.Except Child. 2014; 80: 169-186
- Language-minority learners in special education: rates and predictors of identification for services.J Learn Disabil. 2009; 42: 148-162
- Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners.Except Child. 2011; 77: 317-334
- Promoting optimal development: identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders through developmental surveillance and screening.Pediatrics. 2020; 145e20193449
- Grounded Theory.Oxford University Press, USA2012
- Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.Acad Med. 2014; 89: 1245-1251
- Obtaining systematic teacher reports of disruptive behavior disorders utilizing DSM-IV.J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998; 26: 141-152
- Do pediatricians think they are responsible for identification and management of child mental health problems? Results of the AAP periodic survey.Ambul Pediatr. 2008; 8: 11-17
- Beyond ADHD: how well are we doing?.Acad Pediatr. 2016; 16: 115-121
- Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008.Pediatrics. 2011; 127: 1034-1042
- Twenty-year trends in diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among US children and adolescents, 1997-2016.JAMA Netw Open. 2018; 1e181471
- Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.Pediatrics. 2019; 144e20192528
- Society for developmental and behavioral pediatrics clinical practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with complex attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2020; 41: S35-S57
- Special education teachers' views of research-based practices.J Special Educ. 2016; 39: 168-180
- Resident training in developmental/behavioral pediatrics: where do we stand?.Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007; 46: 135-145
- Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a national survey of training and current assessment practices in the schools.Psychol Sch. 2003; 40: 583-597
- Training school psychologists to identify specific learning disabilities: a content analysis of syllabi.School Psych Rev. 2019; 44: 271-288
- Does length of developmental behavioral pediatrics training matter?.Acad Pediatr. 2017; 17: 61-67
- Kindergarten screening tools filled out by parents and teachers targeting dyslexia. Predictions and developmental trajectories from age 5 to age 15 years.Dyslexia. 2021; 27: 413-435
- Guide to Learning Disabilities for Primary Care: How to Screen, Identify, Manage, and Advocate for Children with Learning Disabilities.American Academy of Pediatrics, 2010https://doi.org/10.1542/9781581104875 (Accessed January 17, 2022)
- Guide to learning disabilities for primary care: how to screen, identify, manage, and advocate for children with learning disabilities.J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013; 34: 556
- Integrated medical-behavioral care compared with usual primary care for child and adolescent behavioral health: a meta-analysis.JAMA Pediatrics. 2015; 169: 929-937
- Pediatric psychology in primary care.in: James LC Folen RA The Primary Care Consultant: The Next Frontier for Psychologists in Hospitals and Clinics. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US2005: 155-172
Association of American Medical Colleges. Diversity in Medicine: Facts and Figures 2019. Washington, DC 2019.
- Demographics of U.S.Psychology Workforce [Interactive data tool], Washington, DC2022
Article info
Publication history
Published online: December 26, 2022
Accepted:
December 17,
2022
Received:
May 31,
2022
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Conflicts of Interest: None.
Identification
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 by Academic Pediatric Association