x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Immunization
Author
- Kempe, Allison11
- Daley, Matthew F5
- Stokley, Shannon5
- Albright, Karen4
- Beaty, Brenda4
- Dickinson, L Miriam4
- Hambidge, Simon J4
- Humiston, Sharon G4
- Crane, Lori A3
- Dickinson, Miriam3
- Lockhart, Steven3
- Saville, Alison W3
- Albertin, Christina2
- Allison, Mandy A2
- Allred, Norma J2
- Barnard, Juliana2
- Beaty, Brenda L2
- Blumkin, Aaron2
- Brtnikova, Michaela2
- Bundy, David G2
- Campagna, Elizabeth J2
- Cheng, Tina L2
- Clark, Sarah J2
- Kile, Deidre2
- O'Leary, Sean2
Keyword
- immunization11
- immunizations6
- adolescent5
- child4
- disparities4
- quality improvement4
- adolescent health3
- children3
- recall and reminder messages3
- vaccination3
- adolescent immunization2
- asthma2
- centralized reminder/recall2
- child health2
- CHIPRA2
- electronic health records2
- HPV vaccine2
- immunization delivery2
- influenza2
- influenza immunization2
- Medicaid2
- mixed methods2
- population-based reminder/recall2
- vaccine2
- CHIP1
Immunization
88 Results
- Research in Immunization
School-Located Influenza Vaccination With Third-Party Billing: Outcomes, Cost, and Reimbursement
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 3p234–240Published in issue: May, 2014- Allison Kempe
- Matthew F. Daley
- Jennifer Pyrzanowski
- Tara Vogt
- Hai Fang
- Deborah J. Rinehart
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 14To assess rates of immunization; costs of conducting clinics; and reimbursements for a school-located influenza vaccination (SLIV) program that billed third-party payers. - Research in Immunization
School-Located Influenza Vaccination With Third-Party Billing: What Do Parents Think?
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 3p241–248Published in issue: May, 2014- Allison Kempe
- Matthew F. Daley
- Jennifer Pyrzanowski
- Tara M. Vogt
- Elizabeth J. Campagna
- L. Miriam Dickinson
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 15School-located influenza vaccination (SLIV) may be instrumental in achieving high vaccination rates among children. Sustainability of SLIV programs may require third-party billing. This study assessed, among parents of elementary school students, the attitudes about SLIV and billing at school, as well as factors associated with being supportive of SLIV. - Research in Immunization
Novel Immunization Reminder/Recall Approaches: Rural and Urban Differences in Parent Perceptions
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 3p249–255Published in issue: May, 2014- Alison W. Saville
- Brenda Beaty
- L. Miriam Dickinson
- Steven Lockhart
- Allison Kempe
Cited in Scopus: 20To assess the following among parents of young children: 1) preferences about the source of immunization reminder/recall (R/R) messages, 2) the degree of acceptability of different R/R modalities, and 3) factors that influence preferences, including rural and urban characteristics. - Perspectives
Children and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Opportunities and Challenges in an Evolving System
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 3p225–233Published in issue: May, 2014- David Keller
- Lisa J. Chamberlain
Cited in Scopus: 25The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), passed in 2010, focused primarily on the problems of adults, but the changes in payment for and delivery of care it fosters will likely impact the health care of children. The evolving epidemiology of pediatric illness in the United States has resulted in a relatively small population of medically fragile children dispersed through the country and a large population of children with developmental and behavioral health issues who experience wide degrees of health disparities. - Commentary
School-Located Influenza Vaccination: Can Collaborative Efforts Go the Distance?
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 3p219–220Published in issue: May, 2014- Sharon G. Humiston
- Katherine A. Poehling
- Peter G. Szilagyi
Cited in Scopus: 9Despite a large amount of publicity about universal pediatric influenza vaccination, nationally, influenza vaccination rates among school-aged children remain low. Only 59% of 5- to 12-year-old children and 43% of 13- to 17-year-old adolescents were vaccinated during the 2012 to 2103 flu vaccination season.1 It is time to consider new paradigms to complement traditional influenza vaccinations in primary care. One “new” paradigm involves school-located influenza vaccination (SLIV), about which there is a great deal of confusion. - In Brief
Table of Contents
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 3A1–A2Published in issue: May, 2014Cited in Scopus: 0219 School-Located Influenza Vaccination: Can Collaborative Efforts Go the Distance? Sharon G. Humiston, Katherine A. Poehling, and Peter G. Szilagyi - Immunization
Provider Attitudes Toward Public-Private Collaboration to Improve Immunization Reminder/Recall: A Mixed-Methods Study
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 1p62–70Published in issue: January, 2014- Karen Albright
- Alison Saville
- Steven Lockhart
- Katina Widmer Racich
- Brenda Beaty
- Allison Kempe
Cited in Scopus: 13To assess primary care providers' current reminder/recall practices, preferences for collaboration with health departments in reminder/recall efforts, attitudes toward practice-based and population-based reminder/recall, and experiences with a population-based reminder/recall intervention. - Immunization
Evaluating Washington State’s Immunization Information System as a Research Tool
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 1p71–76Published in issue: January, 2014- Michael L. Jackson
- Nora B. Henrikson
- David C. Grossman
Cited in Scopus: 20Immunization information systems (IISs) are powerful public health tools for vaccination activities. To date, however, their use for public health research has been limited, in part as a result of insufficient understanding on accuracy and quality of IIS data. We evaluated the completeness and accuracy of Washington State IIS (WAIIS) data, with particular attention to data elements of research interest. - In Brief
Table of Contents
Academic PediatricsVol. 14Issue 1A1–A2Published in issue: January, 2014Cited in Scopus: 01 Educating for Quality: Quality Improvement as an Activity of Daily Learning to Improve Educational and Patient Outcomes John Patrick T. Co - Commentary
The American Academy of Pediatrics and Quality Improvement
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 6SupplementS7–S8Published in issue: November, 2013- Thomas K. McInerny
- Ramesh C. Sachdeva
Cited in Scopus: 3Quality is 1 of the 3 main pillars supporting the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Agenda for Children. The AAP has developed and promoted quality improvement (QI) programs to its membership for several decades. For more than 20 years, the AAP has maintained a committee of pediatrician leaders who have demonstrated an expertise in the area of QI and quality measurement, currently named the Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management. This committee works on developing pediatric QI measures, identifying patient safety programmatic and educational opportunities, reviewing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, writing QI-related policy statements, and determining methodologies for implementing QI in both primary care and specialty pediatric practices. - QI in Clinical Settings
The National Improvement Partnership Network: State-Based Partnerships That Improve Primary Care Quality
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 6SupplementS84–S94Published in issue: November, 2013- Judith S. Shaw
- Chuck Norlin
- R.J. Gillespie
- Mark Weissman
- Jane McGrath
Cited in Scopus: 26Improvement partnerships (IPs) are a model for collaboration among public and private organizations that share interests in improving child health and the quality of health care delivered to children. Their partners typically include state public health and Medicaid agencies, the local chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and an academic health care organization or children's hospital. Most IPs also engage other partners, including a variety of public, private, and professional organizations and individuals. - QI in Clinical Settings
Nine States' Use of Collaboratives to Improve Children's Health Care Quality in Medicaid and CHIP
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 6SupplementS95–S102Published in issue: November, 2013- Kelly J. Devers
- Leslie Foster
- Cindy Brach
Cited in Scopus: 15We examine quality improvement (QI) collaboratives underway in 9 states participating in the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) Quality Demonstration Grant Program. A total of 147 diverse, child-serving practices were participating in the collaboratives. We conducted 256 semistructured interviews with key stakeholders from March to August 2012—2 years into the 5-year demonstration projects—and analyzed states’ grant applications, operating plans, and progress reports. - Methods in QI Research
Considering Context in Quality Improvement Interventions and Implementation: Concepts, Frameworks, and Application
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 6SupplementS45–S53Published in issue: November, 2013- Kathryn M. McDonald
Cited in Scopus: 46Growing consensus within the health care field suggests that context matters and needs more concerted study for helping those who implement and conduct research on quality improvement interventions. Health care delivery system decision makers require information about whether an intervention tested in one context will work in another with some differences from the original site. We aimed to define key terms, enumerate candidate domains for the study of context, provide examples from the pediatric quality improvement literature, and identify potential measures for selected contexts. - QI in Clinical Settings
Quality Improvement Initiatives in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Networks: Achievements and Challenges
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 6SupplementS75–S83Published in issue: November, 2013- Vibhuti Shah
- Ruth Warre
- Shoo K. Lee
Cited in Scopus: 53Neonatal intensive care unit networks that encompass regions, states, and even entire countries offer the perfect platform for implementing continuous quality improvement initiatives to advance the health care provided to vulnerable neonates. Through cycles of identification and implementation of best available evidence, benchmarking, and feedback of outcomes, combined with mutual collaborative learning through a network of providers, the performance of health care systems and neonatal outcomes can be improved. - Index
Subject Index
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 6e3–e11Published in issue: November, 2013Cited in Scopus: 0Adolescence; see Adolescent - Immunization
HPV Vaccination of Boys in Primary Care Practices
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 5p466–474Published in issue: September, 2013- Mandy A. Allison
- Eileen F. Dunne
- Lauri E. Markowitz
- Sean T. O'Leary
- Lori A. Crane
- Laura P. Hurley
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 30In October 2011, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV4) for the routine immunization schedule for 11- to 12-year-old boys. Before October 2011, HPV4 was permissively recommended for boys. We conducted a study in 2010 to provide data that could guide efforts to implement routine HPV4 immunization in boys. Our objectives were to describe primary care physicians': 1) knowledge and attitudes about human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease and HPV4, 2) recommendation and administration practices regarding HPV vaccine in boys compared to girls, 3) perceived barriers to HPV4 administration in boys, and 4) personal and practice characteristics associated with recommending HPV4 to boys. - Immunization
A Randomized Trial to Increase Acceptance of Childhood Vaccines by Vaccine-Hesitant Parents: A Pilot Study
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 5p475–480Published in issue: September, 2013- S. Elizabeth Williams
- Russell L. Rothman
- Paul A. Offit
- William Schaffner
- Molly Sullivan
- Kathryn M. Edwards
Cited in Scopus: 58A cluster randomized trial was performed to evaluate an educational intervention to improve parental attitudes and vaccine uptake in vaccine-hesitant parents. - Immunization
A Mixed Methods Study of Parental Vaccine Decision Making and Parent–Provider Trust
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 5p481–488Published in issue: September, 2013- Jason M. Glanz
- Nicole M. Wagner
- Komal J. Narwaney
- Jo Ann Shoup
- David L. McClure
- Emily V. McCormick
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 116To describe parental vaccine decision making behaviors and characterize trust in physician advice among parents with varying childhood vaccination behaviors. - Commentary
Communicating With Parents About Immunization Safety: Messages for Pediatricians in the IOM Report “The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety: Stakeholder Concerns, Scientific Evidence, and Future Studies”
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 5p387–389Published in issue: September, 2013- Gerry Fairbrother
- Elena Fuentes-Afflick
- Lainie Friedman Ross
- Pauline A. Thomas
Cited in Scopus: 3The report, “The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety: Stakeholder Concerns, Scientific Evidence, and Future Studies,” released by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in January 2013, is highly relevant for the pediatric community.1 Although many studies have assessed the safety of immunizations, to our knowledge, this is the first study to address the childhood immunization schedule as a whole. The purpose of this commentary is to highlight the report's most pertinent findings and recommendations for the pediatric community. - Perspective
Importance of Mixed Methods in Pragmatic Trials and Dissemination and Implementation Research
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 5p400–407Published in issue: September, 2013- Karen Albright
- Katherine Gechter
- Allison Kempe
Cited in Scopus: 78With increased attention to the importance of translating research to clinical practice and policy, recent years have seen a proliferation of particular types of research, including pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research. Such research seeks to understand how and why interventions function in real-world settings, as opposed to highly controlled settings involving conditions not likely to be repeated outside the research study. Because understanding the context in which interventions are implemented is imperative for effective pragmatic trials and dissemination and implementation research, the use of mixed methods is critical to understanding trial results and the success or failure of implementation efforts. - In Brief
Table of Contents
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 5A1Published in issue: September, 2013Cited in Scopus: 0387 Communicating With Parents About Immunization Safety: Messages for Pediatricians in the IOM Report “The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety: Stakeholder Concerns, Scientific Evidence, and Future Studies” Gerry Fairbrother, Elena Fuentes-Afflick, Lainie Friedman Ross, and Pauline A. Thomas - Immunization
Improving Immunization Delivery using an Electronic Health Record: The ImmProve Project
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 5p458–465Published online: May 30, 2013- David G. Bundy
- Nichole M. Persing
- Barry S. Solomon
- Tracy M. King
- Peter N. Murakami
- Richard E. Thompson
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 27Though an essential pediatric preventive service, immunizations are challenging to deliver reliably. Our objective was to measure the impact on pediatric immunization rates of providing clinicians with electronic health record–derived immunization prompting. - Health Care in the Digital Age
Correlates of Patient Portal Enrollment and Activation in Primary Care Pediatrics
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 3p264–271Published in issue: May, 2013- Tara Ketterer
- David W. West
- Victoria P. Sanders
- Jobayer Hossain
- Michelle C. Kondo
- Iman Sharif
Cited in Scopus: 49To identify the demographic, practice site, and clinical predictors of patient portal enrollment and activation among a pediatric primary care population. - Commentary
The Challenge of Reaching Adolescents to Promote Health Care
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 3p184–185Published in issue: May, 2013- Simon J. Hambidge
Cited in Scopus: 2The challenge of providing appropriate preventive health services to adolescents is one familiar to all pediatricians who care for this population. Adolescents have fewer recommended preventive health medical visits than young children and may not have regular contact with the health care system. In recent years, new adolescent vaccines have been developed and recommended to provide protection against pertussis (TdaP), meningococcal meningitis (MCV4), and human papillomavirus (HPV), increasing the need for appropriate preventive health care. - Adolescents
A Randomized Trial of the Effect of Centralized Reminder/Recall on Immunizations and Preventive Care Visits for Adolescents
Academic PediatricsVol. 13Issue 3p204–213Published online: March 18, 2013- Peter G. Szilagyi
- Christina Albertin
- Sharon G. Humiston
- Cynthia M. Rand
- Stanley Schaffer
- Howard Brill
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 89To assess the impact of a managed care-based patient reminder/recall system on immunization rates and preventive care visits among low-income adolescents.